The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patterns of Expression and Normalized Levels of the Five Arabidopsis Phytochromes
Open accessAbstract
Using monoclonal antibodies specific for each apoprotein and full-length purified apoprotein standards, the levels of the five Arabidopsis phytochromes and their patterns of expression in seedlings and mature plants and under different light conditions have been characterized. Phytochrome levels are normalized to the DNA content of the various tissue extracts to approximate normalization to the number of cells in the tissue. One phytochrome, phytochrome A, is highly light labile. The other four phytochromes are much more light stable, although among these, phytochromes B and C are reduced 4- to 5-fold in red- or white-light-grown seedlings compared with dark-grown seedlings. The total amount of extractable phytochrome is 23-fold lower in light-grown than dark-grown tissues, and the percent ratios of the five phytochromes, A:B:C:D:E, are measured as 85:10:2:1.5:1.5 in etiolated seedlings and 5:40:15:15:25 in seedlings grown in continuous white light. The four light-stable phytochromes are present at nearly unchanging levels throughout the course of development of mature rosette and reproductive-stage plants and are present in leaves, stems, roots, and flowers. Phytochrome protein expression patterns over the course of seed germination and under diurnal and circadian light cycles are also characterized. Little cycling in response to photoperiod is observed, and this very low amplitude cycling of some phytochrome proteins is out of phase with previously reported cycling ofPHY mRNA levels. These studies indicate that, with the exception of phytochrome A, the family of phytochrome photoreceptors in Arabidopsis constitutes a quite stable and very broadly distributed array of sensory molecules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phytochrome Signaling Mechanisms
Li, J., Li, G., Wang, H., & Wang Deng, X. (2011) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0148 · Cited by 561
Phytochrome signaling mechanisms and the control of plant development
Chen, M., & Chory, J. (2011) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2011.07.002 · Cited by 448
Molecular mechanisms underlying phytochrome-controlled morphogenesis in plants
Legris, M., Ince, Y. Ç., & Fankhauser, C. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13045-0 · Cited by 429
Living by the calendar: how plants know when to flower
Yanovsky, M. J., & Kay, S. A. (2003) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1077 · Cited by 317
Arnold, A., & Nikoloski, Z. (2014) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.114.235358 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharrock, R. A., & Clack, T.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-09-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 442-456
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2138469844
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of Expression and Normalized Levels of the Five Arabidopsis Phytochromes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.005389
- The paper
- Sharrock, R. A., & Clack, T. (2002). Patterns of Expression and Normalized Levels of the Five Arabidopsis Phytochromes. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.005389
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.