The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome-Wide Identification of Nodule-Specific Transcripts in the Model Legume Medicago truncatula
Open accessAbstract
The Medicago truncatula expressed sequence tag (EST) database (Gene Index) contains over 140,000 sequences from 30 cDNA libraries. This resource offers the possibility of identifying previously uncharacterized genes and assessing the frequency and tissue specificity of their expression in silico. BecauseM. truncatula forms symbiotic root nodules, unlike Arabidopsis, this is a particularly important approach in investigating genes specific to nodule development and function in legumes. Our analyses have revealed 340 putative gene products, or tentative consensus sequences (TCs), expressed solely in root nodules. These TCs were represented by two to 379 ESTs. Of these TCs, 3% appear to encode novel proteins, 57% encode proteins with a weak similarity to the GenBank accessions, and 40% encode proteins with strong similarity to the known proteins. Nodule-specific TCs were grouped into nine categories based on the predicted function of their protein products. Besides previously characterized nodulins, other examples of highly abundant nodule-specific transcripts include plantacyanin, agglutinin, embryo-specific protein, and purine permease. Six nodule-specific TCs encode calmodulin-like proteins that possess a unique cleavable transit sequence potentially targeting the protein into the peribacteroid space. Surprisingly, 114 nodule-specific TCs encode small Cys cluster proteins with a cleavable transit peptide. To determine the validity of the in silico analysis, expression of 91 putative nodule-specific TCs was analyzed by macroarray and RNA-blot hybridizations. Nodule-enhanced expression was confirmed experimentally for the TCs composed of five or more ESTs, whereas the results for those TCs containing fewer ESTs were variable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
Cited by
WRKY70 modulates the selection of signaling pathways in plant defense
Li, J., Brader, G., Kariola, T., & Tapio Palva, E. (2006) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02712.x · Cited by 565
Puppo, A., Groten, K., Bastian, F., Carzaniga, R., Soussi, M., Lucas, M. M., De Felipe, M. R., Harrison, J., Vanacker, H., & Foyer, C. H. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01285.x · Cited by 345
Liu, J., Blaylock, L. A., Endre, G., Cho, J., Town, C. D., VandenBosch, K. A., & Harrison, M. J. (2003) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.014183 · Cited by 337
Self-citationHohnjec, N., Vieweg, M. F., Pühler, A., Becker, A., & Küster, H. (2005) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.104.056572 · Cited by 324
Bridging Model and Crop Legumes through Comparative Genomics
Zhu, H., Choi, H.-K., Cook, D. R., & Shoemaker, R. C. (2005) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.104.058891 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Fedorova, M., van de Mortel, J., Matsumoto, P. A., Cho, J., Town, C. D., VandenBosch, K. A., Gantt, J. S., & Vance, C. P.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-10-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 519-537
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2115836628
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.