The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High-Resolution Metabolic Phenotyping of Genetically and Environmentally Diverse Potato Tuber Systems. Identification of Phenocopies
Open accessAbstract
We conducted a comprehensive metabolic phenotyping of potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv Desiree) tuber tissue that had been modified either by transgenesis or exposure to different environmental conditions using a recently developed gas chromatography-mass spectrometry profiling protocol. Applying this technique, we were able to identify and quantify the major constituent metabolites of the potato tuber within a single chromatographic run. The plant systems that we selected to profile were tuber discs incubated in varying concentrations of fructose, sucrose, and mannitol and transgenic plants impaired in their starch biosynthesis. The resultant profiles were then compared, first at the level of individual metabolites and then using the statistical tools hierarchical cluster analysis and principal component analysis. These tools allowed us to assign clusters to the individual plant systems and to determine relative distances between these clusters; furthermore, analyzing the loadings of these analyses enabled identification of the most important metabolites in the definition of these clusters. The metabolic profiles of the sugar-fed discs were dramatically different from the wild-type steady-state values. When these profiles were compared with one another and also with those we assessed in previous studies, however, we were able to evaluate potential phenocopies. These comparisons highlight the importance of such an approach in the functional and qualitative assessment of diverse systems to gain insights into important mediators of metabolism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plant metabolomics: towards biological function and mechanism
SCHAUER, N., & FERNIE, A. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2006.08.007 · Cited by 434
Self-citationNontargeted Metabolome Analysis by Use of Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Mass Spectrometry
Aharoni, A., Ric de Vos, C. H., Verhoeven, H. A., Maliepaard, C. A., Kruppa, G., Bino, R., & Goodenowe, D. B. (2002) · OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology · doi:10.1089/15362310260256882 · Cited by 428
Unintended effects and their detection in genetically modified crops
Cellini, F., Chesson, A., Colquhoun, I., Constable, A., Davies, H. V., Engel, K. H., Gatehouse, A. M. R., Kärenlampi, S., Kok, E. J., Leguay, J.-J., et al. (2004) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2004.02.003 · Cited by 397
Molecular and Biochemical Triggers of Potato Tuber Development
Fernie, A. R., & Willmitzer, L. (2001) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.010764 · Cited by 364
Self-citationQuantitative metabolomics based on gas chromatography mass spectrometry: status and perspectives
Koek, M. M., Jellema, R. H., van der Greef, J., Tas, A. C., & Hankemeier, T. (2011) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-010-0254-3 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Roessner, U., Willmitzer, L., & Fernie, A. R.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-11-01
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 749-764
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2038295777
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Resolution Metabolic Phenotyping of Genetically and Environmentally Diverse Potato Tuber Systems. Identification of Phenocopies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.010316
- The paper
- Roessner, U., Willmitzer, L., & Fernie, A. R. (2001). High-Resolution Metabolic Phenotyping of Genetically and Environmentally Diverse Potato Tuber Systems. Identification of Phenocopies. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.010316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.