The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of Positive Pressures to Establish Vulnerability Curves: Further Support for the Air-Seeding Hypothesis and Implications for Pressure-Volume Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Loss of hydraulic conductivity occurs in stems when the water in xylem conduits is subjected to sufficiently negative pressure. According to the air-seeding hypothesis, this loss of conductivity occurs when air bubbles are sucked into water-filled conduits through micropores adjacent to air spaces in the stem. Results in this study showed that loss of hydraulic conductivity occurred in stem segments pressurized in a pressure chamber while the xylem water was under positive pressure. Vulnerability curves can be defined as a plot of percentage loss of hydraulic conductivity versus the pressure difference between xylem water and the outside air inducing the loss of conductivity. Vulnerability curves were similar whether loss of conductivity was induced by lowering the xylem water pressure or by raising the external air pressure. These results are consistent with the air-seeding hypothesis of how embolisms are nucleated, but not with the nucleation of embolisms at hydrophobic cracks because the latter requires negative xylem water pressure. The results also call into question some basic underlying assumptions used in the determination of components of tissue water potential using "pressure-volume" analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ADAPTIVE VARIATION IN THE VULNERABILITY OF WOODY PLANTS TO XYLEM CAVITATION
Maherali, H., Pockman, W. T., & Jackson, R. B. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-0538 · Cited by 746
Size and function in conifer tracheids and angiosperm vessels
Sperry, J. S., Hacke, U. G., & Pittermann, J. (2006) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.93.10.1490 · Cited by 710
Plant xylem hydraulics: What we understand, current research, and future challenges
Venturas, M. D., Sperry, J. S., & Hacke, U. G. (2017) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.12534 · Cited by 487
Intra‐ and inter‐plant variation in xylem cavitation in Betula occidentalis
SPERRY, J. S., & SALIENDRA, N. Z. (1994) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb02021.x · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Cochard, H., Cruiziat, P., & Tyree, M. T.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-09-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 205-209
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2001139608
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Positive Pressures to Establish Vulnerability Curves: Further Support for the Air-Seeding Hypothesis and Implications for Pressure-Volume Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.100.1.205
- The paper
- Cochard, H., Cruiziat, P., & Tyree, M. T. (1992). Use of Positive Pressures to Establish Vulnerability Curves: Further Support for the Air-Seeding Hypothesis and Implications for Pressure-Volume Analysis. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.100.1.205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.