The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sucrose Synthase, Starch Accumulation, and Tomato Fruit Sink Strength
Open accessAbstract
Contrasting evidence has accumulated regarding the role of acid invertase and sucrose synthase in tomato fruit sink establishment and maintenance. In this work the relationships among the activities of sucrose synthase and acid invertase, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill cv UC-82B fruit growth, and starch accumulation were analyzed in fruit at 0 to 39 d after anthesis. Sucrose synthase, but not acid invertase, was found to be positively correlated with tomato fruit relative growth rate and with starch content in the pericarp tissue. A similar association between sucrose synthase activity and starch accumulation was also evident in the basal portion of the stem. Heat-shock treatments, which inhibited the increase in sucrose synthase activity at the beginning of the light period and had no effect on acid invertase activity, were used to examine the importance of sucrose synthase in relation to sucrose metabolism and starch synthesis. After the heat-shock treatment, concomitantly with the suppressed sucrose synthase activity relative to the controls, there was a reduction in sucrose cleavage and starch accumulation. These data substantiate the conclusion that, during the early phases of tomato fruit development, sucrose synthase rather than acid invertase is the dominant enzyme in metabolizing imported sucrose, which in turn plays a part in regulating the import of sucrose into the fruit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A PHOTOMETRIC ADAPTATION OF THE SOMOGYI METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF GLUCOSE
Nelson, N. (1944) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)71980-7 · Cited by 10,370
A COLORIMETRIC METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF FRUCTOSE IN BLOOD AND URINE
Roe, J. H. (1934) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)75382-9 · Cited by 1,013
Keeling, P. L., Wood, J. R., Tyson, R. H., & Bridges, I. G. (1988) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.87.2.311 · Cited by 194
A reassessment of glycolysis and gluconeogenesis in higher plants
Sung, S.-J. S., Xu, D., Galloway, C. M., et al. (1988) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1988.tb09177.x · Cited by 115
Control of the hexose content of potato tubers
Morrell, S., & Rees, T. A. (1986) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(00)81556-3 · Cited by 68
Cited by
Fruits: A Developmental Perspective.
Gillaspy, G., Ben-David, H., & Gruissem, W. (1993) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.5.10.1439 · Cited by 1,198
Grain filling of cereals under soil drying
Yang, J., & Zhang, J. (2006) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01597.x · Cited by 787
Mycorrhizal sink strength influences whole plant carbon balance of Trifolium repens L.
Wright, D. P., Read, D. J., & Scholes, J. D. (1998) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00351.x · Cited by 279
Li, X.-Q., & Zhang, D. (2003) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/pcp/pcg080 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, F., Sanz, A., Brenner, M. L., & Smith, A.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-01-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 321-327
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2106287688
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sucrose Synthase, Starch Accumulation, and Tomato Fruit Sink Strength. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.101.1.321
- The paper
- Wang, F., Sanz, A., Brenner, M. L., & Smith, A. (1993). Sucrose Synthase, Starch Accumulation, and Tomato Fruit Sink Strength. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.101.1.321
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.