The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phytoremediation of Organomercurial Compounds via Chloroplast Genetic Engineering
Open accessAbstract
Mercury (Hg), especially in organic form, is a highly toxic pollutant affecting plants, animals, and man. In plants, the primary target of Hg damage is the chloroplast; Hg inhibits electron transport and photosynthesis. In the present study, chloroplast genetic engineering is used for the first time to our knowledge to enhance the capacity of plants for phytoremediation. This was achieved by integrating a native operon containing the merA and merB genes (without any codon modification), which code for mercuric ion reductase (merA) and organomercurial lyase (merB), respectively, into the chloroplast genome in a single transformation event. Stable integration of the merAB operon into the chloroplast genome resulted in high levels of tolerance to the organomercurial compound, phenylmercuric acetate (PMA) when grown in soil containing up to 400 μm PMA; plant dry weights of the chloroplast transformed lines were significantly higher than those of wild type at 100, 200, and 400 μm PMA. That the merAB operon was stably integrated into the chloroplast genome was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction and Southern-blot analyses. Northern-blot analyses revealed stable transcripts that were independent of the presence or absence of a 3′-untranslated region downstream of the coding sequence. The merAB dicistron was the more abundant transcript, but less abundant monocistrons were also observed, showing that specific processing occurs between transgenes. The use of chloroplast transformation to enhance Hg phytoremediation is particularly beneficial because it prevents the escape of transgenes via pollen to related weeds or crops and there is no need for codon optimization to improve transgene expression. Chloroplast transformation may also have application to other metals that affect chloroplast function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DeGray, G., Rajasekaran, K., Smith, F., Sanford, J., & Daniell, H. (2001) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.010233 · Cited by 299
Self-citation
Cited by
Wu, G., Kang, H., Zhang, X., Shao, H., Chu, L., & Ruan, C. (2010) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.113 · Cited by 640
PLASTID TRANSFORMATION IN HIGHER PLANTS
Maliga, P. (2004) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141633 · Cited by 486
Transgenic Plants in Phytoremediation: Recent Advances and New Possibilities
Cherian, S., & Oliveira, M. M. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es051134l · Cited by 425
Particle bombardment and the genetic enhancement of crops: myths and realities
Altpeter, F., Baisakh, N., Beachy, R., Bock, R., Capell, T., Christou, P., Daniell, H., Datta, K., Datta, S., Dix, P. J., et al. (2005) · Molecular Breeding · doi:10.1007/s11032-004-8001-y · Cited by 371
Self-citationArthur, E. L., Rice, P. J., Rice, P. J., Anderson, T. A., Baladi, S. M., Henderson, K. L. D., & Coats, J. R. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680590952496 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruiz, O. N., Hussein, H. S., Terry, N., & Daniell, H.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-07-01
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1344-1352
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1986445603
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phytoremediation of Organomercurial Compounds via Chloroplast Genetic Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.103.020958
- The paper
- Ruiz, O. N., Hussein, H. S., Terry, N., & Daniell, H. (2003). Phytoremediation of Organomercurial Compounds via Chloroplast Genetic Engineering. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.020958
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.