The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genomic Comparison of P-Type ATPase Ion Pumps in Arabidopsis and Rice
Open accessAbstract
Members of the P-type ATPase ion pump superfamily are found in all three branches of life. Forty-six P-type ATPase genes were identified in Arabidopsis, the largest number yet identified in any organism. The recent completion of two draft sequences of the rice (Oryza sativa) genome allows for comparison of the full complement of P-type ATPases in two different plant species. Here, we identify a similar number (43) in rice, despite the rice genome being more than three times the size of Arabidopsis. The similarly large families suggest that both dicots and monocots have evolved with a large preexisting repertoire of P-type ATPases. Both Arabidopsis and rice have representative members in all five major subfamilies of P-type ATPases: heavy-metal ATPases (P1B), Ca2 +-ATPases (endoplasmic reticulum-type Ca2 +-ATPase and autoinhibited Ca2 +-ATPase, P2A and P2B), H+-ATPases (autoinhibited H+-ATPase, P3A), putative aminophospholipid ATPases (ALA, P4), and a branch with unknown specificity (P5). The close pairing of similar isoforms in rice and Arabidopsis suggests potential orthologous relationships for all 43 rice P-type ATPases. A phylogenetic comparison of protein sequences and intron positions indicates that the common angiosperm ancestor had at least 23 P-type ATPases. Although little is known about unique and common features of related pumps, clear differences between some members of the calcium pumps indicate that evolutionarily conserved clusters may distinguish pumps with either different subcellular locations or biochemical functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
White, P. J., & Broadley, M. R. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02738.x · Cited by 2,178
Yruela, I. (2005) · Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1590/s1677-04202005000100012 · Cited by 1,010
Copper in plants: acquisition, transport and interactions
Yruela, I. (2009) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp08288 · Cited by 912
McAinsh, M. R., & Pittman, J. K. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02682.x · Cited by 756
Krämer, U., Talke, I. N., & Hanikenne, M. (2007) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2007.04.010 · Cited by 583
Metadata
- Authors
- Baxter, I., Tchieu, J., Sussman, M. R., Boutry, M., Palmgren, M. G., Gribskov, M., Harper, J. F., & Axelsen, K. B.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 618-628
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2110651606
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic Comparison of P-Type ATPase Ion Pumps in Arabidopsis and Rice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.103.021923
- The paper
- Baxter, I., Tchieu, J., Sussman, M. R., Boutry, M., Palmgren, M. G., Gribskov, M., Harper, J. F., & Axelsen, K. B. (2003). Genomic Comparison of P-Type ATPase Ion Pumps in Arabidopsis and Rice. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.021923
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.