The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dehydroascorbate Influences the Plant Cell Cycle through a Glutathione-Independent Reduction Mechanism
Open accessAbstract
Glutathione is generally accepted as the principal electron donor for dehydroascorbate (DHA) reduction. Moreover, both glutathione and DHA affect cell cycle progression in plant cells. But other mechanisms for DHA reduction have been proposed. To investigate the connection between DHA and glutathione, we have evaluated cellular ascorbate and glutathione concentrations and their redox status after addition of dehydroascorbate to medium of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) L. cv Bright Yellow-2 (BY-2) cells. Addition of 1 mm DHA did not change the endogenous glutathione concentration. Total glutathione depletion of BY-2 cells was achieved after 24-h incubation with 1 mm of the glutathione biosynthesis inhibitor l-buthionine sulfoximine. Even in these cells devoid of glutathione, complete uptake and internal reduction of 1 mm DHA was observed within 6 h, although the initial reduction rate was slower. Addition of DHA to a synchronized BY-2 culture, or depleting its glutathione content, had a synergistic effect on cell cycle progression. Moreover, increased intracellular glutathione concentrations did not prevent exogenous DHA from inducing a cell cycle shift. It is therefore concluded that, together with a glutathione-driven DHA reduction, a glutathione-independent pathway for DHA reduction exists in vivo, and that both compounds act independently in growth control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Griffith, O. W., & Meister, A. (1979) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)35980-5 · Cited by 1,683
The physiological role of dehydroascorbic acid
Wilson, J. X. (2002) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(02)03167-8 · Cited by 218
Cited by
FOYER, C. H., & NOCTOR, G. (2005) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01327.x · Cited by 1,887
Redox Regulation in Photosynthetic Organisms: Signaling, Acclimation, and Practical Implications
Foyer, C. H., & Noctor, G. (2009) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2008.2177 · Cited by 1,431
Queval, G., & Noctor, G. (2007) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ab.2007.01.005 · Cited by 468
Puppo, A., Groten, K., Bastian, F., Carzaniga, R., Soussi, M., Lucas, M. M., De Felipe, M. R., Harrison, J., Vanacker, H., & Foyer, C. H. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01285.x · Cited by 345
Hoque, M. A., Banu, M. N. A., Okuma, E., Amako, K., Nakamura, Y., Shimoishi, Y., & Murata, Y. (2007) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2006.10.004 · Cited by 338
Metadata
- Authors
- Potters, G., Horemans, N., Bellone, S., Caubergs, R. J., Trost, P., Guisez, Y., & Asard, H.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1479-1487
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2109503678
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dehydroascorbate Influences the Plant Cell Cycle through a Glutathione-Independent Reduction Mechanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.103.033548
- The paper
- Potters, G., Horemans, N., Bellone, S., Caubergs, R. J., Trost, P., Guisez, Y., & Asard, H. (2004). Dehydroascorbate Influences the Plant Cell Cycle through a Glutathione-Independent Reduction Mechanism. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.033548
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.