The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of the Jasmonate Response in Plant Susceptibility to Diverse Pathogens with a Range of Lifestyles
Open accessAbstract
Plants defend themselves against attack from insects and pathogens with various resistance strategies. The jasmonate and salicylate signaling pathways are two induced responses that protect plants against these attackers. Knowledge of the range of organisms that are affected by each response is important for understanding how plants coordinate their defenses against multiple attackers and the generality of effect of different resistance mechanisms. The jasmonate response is known to protect plants against a wide range of insect herbivores; in this study, we examined the role of the jasmonate response in susceptibility to eight pathogens with diverse lifestyles in the laboratory and field. Recent biochemical models suggest that the lifestyle of the pathogen (necrotroph versus biotroph) should predict whether the jasmonate response will be involved in resistance. We tested this by examining the susceptibility of wild-type (cv Castlemart with no known genes for resistance to the pathogens used) and jasmonate-deficient mutant tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants (def1) and by employing rescue treatments of the mutant. Plant susceptibility to five of the eight pathogens we examined was reduced by the jasmonate response, including two bacteria (Pseudomonas syringae and Xanthomonas campestris), two fungi (Verticillium dahliae and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici), and an oomycete (Phytophthora infestans). Susceptibility to three fungi was unaffected (Cladosporium fulvum, Oidium neolycopersici, and Septoria lycopersici). Our results indicate that the jasmonate response reduces damage by a wide range of pathogens from different lifestyles, a result that contrasts with the emerging picture of diseases on Arabidopsis. Thus, the generality of jasmonate-based resistance of tomato challenges the view that ecologically distinct plant parasites are resisted via different mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A saponin-detoxifying enzyme mediates suppression of plant defences
Bouarab, K., Melton, R., Peart, J., Baulcombe, D., & Osbourn, A. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00950 · Cited by 257
Cited by
Pathogen profile update: Fusarium oxysporum
MICHIELSE, C. B., & REP, M. (2009) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00538.x · Cited by 786
Ethylene as a modulator of disease resistance in plants
van Loon, L. C., Geraats, B. P. J., & Linthorst, H. J. M. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2006.02.005 · Cited by 623
The effect of potassium nutrition on pest and disease resistance in plants
Amtmann, A., Troufflard, S., & Armengaud, P. (2008) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01075.x · Cited by 527
PLANT-MEDIATED INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PATHOGENIC MICROORGANISMS AND HERBIVOROUS ARTHROPODS
Stout, M. J., Thaler, J. S., & Thomma, B. P. H. J. (2006) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151117 · Cited by 463
Self-citationMacroevolution of plant defense strategies
Agrawal, A. A. (2007) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.012 · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- Thaler, J. S., Owen, B., & Higgins, V. J.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-05-01
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 530-538
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2044012651
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of the Jasmonate Response in Plant Susceptibility to Diverse Pathogens with a Range of Lifestyles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.104.041566
- The paper
- Thaler, J. S., Owen, B., & Higgins, V. J. (2004). The Role of the Jasmonate Response in Plant Susceptibility to Diverse Pathogens with a Range of Lifestyles. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.041566
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.