Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transcriptome Profiling of the Response of Arabidopsis Suspension Culture Cells to Suc Starvation

Open access
Contento, Anthony L., Kim, Sang-Jin, Bassham, Diane C.·2004·Plant Physiology

Abstract

Upon encountering nutrient stress conditions, plant cells undergo extensive metabolic changes and induce nutrient recycling pathways for their continued survival. The role of nutrient mobilization in the response of Arabidopsis suspension cells to Suc starvation was examined. Vacuolar autophagy was induced within 24 h of starvation, with increased expression of vacuolar proteases that are likely to be required for degradation of cytoplasmic components delivered to the vacuole, and thus for nutrient recycling. After 48 h of starvation, culture viability began to decrease, and substantial cell death was evident by 72 h. To provide further insight into the pathways required for survival during Suc deficit, transcriptional profiling during Suc starvation was performed using the ATH1 GeneChip array containing 22,810 probe sets. A significant increase in transcript levels was observed for 343 genes within 48 h of starvation, indicating a response to nutrient stress that utilizes the recycling of cellular components and nutrient scavenging for maintaining cell function, the protection of the cell from death through activation of various defense and stress response pathways, and regulation of these processes by specific protein kinases and transcription factors. These physiological and molecular data support a model in which plant cells initiate a coordinated response of nutrient mobilization at the onset of Suc depletion that is able to maintain cell viability for up to 48 h. After this point, genes potentially involved in cell death increase in expression, whereas those functioning in translation and replication decrease, leading to a decrease in culture viability and activation of cell death programs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.104.044362

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Contento, A. L., Kim, S.-J., & Bassham, D. C.
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
2004-08-01
Volume
135
Issue
4
Pages
2330-2347
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2028820728
Cited by
254
References
77
FWCI
15.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcriptome Profiling of the Response of Arabidopsis Suspension Culture Cells to Suc Starvation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.104.044362
The paper
Contento, A. L., Kim, S.-J., & Bassham, D. C. (2004). Transcriptome Profiling of the Response of Arabidopsis Suspension Culture Cells to Suc Starvation. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.044362

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.