Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 444

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do Xylem Fibers Affect Vessel Cavitation Resistance?

Jacobsen, Anna L., Ewers, Frank W., Pratt, R. Brandon, Paddock, William A., Davis, Stephen D.·2005·Plant Physiology

Abstract

Possible mechanical and hydraulic costs to increased cavitation resistance were examined among six co-occurring species of chaparral shrubs in southern California. We measured cavitation resistance (xylem pressure at 50% loss of hydraulic conductivity), seasonal low pressure potential (P min), xylem conductive efficiency (specific conductivity), mechanical strength of stems (modulus of elasticity and modulus of rupture), and xylem density. At the cellular level, we measured vessel and fiber wall thickness and lumen diameter, transverse fiber wall and total lumen area, and estimated vessel implosion resistance using (t/b)h 2, where t is the thickness of adjoining vessel walls and b is the vessel lumen diameter. Increased cavitation resistance was correlated with increased mechanical strength (r 2 = 0.74 and 0.76 for modulus of elasticity and modulus of rupture, respectively), xylem density (r 2 = 0.88), and P min (r 2 = 0.96). In contrast, cavitation resistance and P min were not correlated with decreased specific conductivity, suggesting no tradeoff between these traits. At the cellular level, increased cavitation resistance was correlated with increased (t/b)h 2 (r 2 = 0.95), increased transverse fiber wall area (r 2 = 0.89), and decreased fiber lumen area (r 2 = 0.76). To our knowledge, the correlation between cavitation resistance and fiber wall area has not been shown previously and suggests a mechanical role for fibers in cavitation resistance. Fiber efficacy in prevention of vessel implosion, defined as inward bending or collapse of vessels, is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.104.058404

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 444

Metadata

Authors
Jacobsen, A. L., Ewers, F. W., Pratt, R. B., Paddock, W. A., & Davis, S. D.
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
2005-08-12
Volume
139
Issue
1
Pages
546-556
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2152121854
Cited by
444
References
28
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do Xylem Fibers Affect Vessel Cavitation Resistance? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.104.058404
The paper
Jacobsen, A. L., Ewers, F. W., Pratt, R. B., Paddock, W. A., & Davis, S. D. (2005). Do Xylem Fibers Affect Vessel Cavitation Resistance? Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.058404

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.