The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transcription Factor Families Have Much Higher Expansion Rates in Plants than in Animals
Open accessAbstract
Transcription factors (TFs), which are central to the regulation of gene expression, are usually members of multigene families. In plants, they are involved in diverse processes such as developmental control and elicitation of defense and stress responses. To investigate if differences exist in the expansion patterns of TF gene families between plants and other eukaryotes, we first used Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) TFs to identify TF DNA-binding domains. These DNA-binding domains were then used to identify related sequences in 25 other eukaryotic genomes. Interestingly, among 19 families that are shared between animals and plants, more than 14 are larger in plants than in animals. After examining the lineage-specific expansion of TF families in two plants, eight animals, and two fungi, we found that TF families shared among these organisms have undergone much more dramatic expansion in plants than in other eukaryotes. Moreover, this elevated expansion rate of plant TF is not simply due to higher duplication rates of plant genomes but also to a higher degree of expansion compared to other plant genes. Further, in many Arabidopsis-rice (Oryza sativa) TF orthologous groups, the degree of lineage-specific expansion in Arabidopsis is correlated with that in rice. This pattern of parallel expansion is much more pronounced than the whole-genome trend in rice and Arabidopsis. The high rate of expansion among plant TF genes and their propensity for parallel expansion suggest frequent adaptive responses to selection pressure common among higher plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Leucine Zipper: A Hypothetical Structure Common to a New Class of DNA Binding Proteins
Landschulz, W. H., Johnson, P. F., & McKnight, S. L. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3289117 · Cited by 3,443
Transcription regulation and animal diversity
Levine, M., & Tjian, R. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01763 · Cited by 1,309
Comparative Genome and Proteome Analysis of Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster
Zdobnov, E. M., von Mering, C., Letunic, I., Torrents, D., Suyama, M., Copley, R. R., Christophides, G. K., Thomasova, D., Holt, R. A., Subramanian, G. M., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077061 · Cited by 553
Transcriptional regulators and the evolution of plant form
Doebley, J., & Lukens, L. (1998) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.10.7.1075 · Cited by 421
Cited by
The evolution of gene regulation by transcription factors and microRNAs
Chen, K., & Rajewsky, N. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1990 · Cited by 1,547
Davies, K. M., Albert, N. W., & Schwinn, K. E. (2012) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp12195 · Cited by 339
Stavridou, E., Webster, R. J., & Robson, P. R. H. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9101266 · Cited by 22
(2024) · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae324 · Cited by 19
Wang, Z., & Zhang, Q. (2009) · Evolutionary Bioinformatics · doi:10.4137/ebo.s2948 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Shiu, S.-H., Shih, M.-C., & Li, W.-H.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-09-01
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-26
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2066471094
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcription Factor Families Have Much Higher Expansion Rates in Plants than in Animals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.105.065110
- The paper
- Shiu, S.-H., Shih, M.-C., & Li, W.-H. (2005). Transcription Factor Families Have Much Higher Expansion Rates in Plants than in Animals. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.065110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.