The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proteomic Analysis of Seed Dormancy in Arabidopsis
Open accessAbstract
The mechanisms controlling seed dormancy in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) have been characterized by proteomics using the dormant (D) accession Cvi originating from the Cape Verde Islands. Comparative studies carried out with freshly harvested dormant and after-ripened non-dormant (ND) seeds revealed a specific differential accumulation of 32 proteins. The data suggested that proteins associated with metabolic functions potentially involved in germination can accumulate during after-ripening in the dry state leading to dormancy release. Exogenous application of abscisic acid (ABA) to ND seeds strongly impeded their germination, which physiologically mimicked the behavior of D imbibed seeds. This application resulted in an alteration of the accumulation pattern of 71 proteins. There was a strong down-accumulation of a major part (90%) of these proteins, which were involved mainly in energetic and protein metabolisms. This feature suggested that exogenous ABA triggers proteolytic mechanisms in imbibed seeds. An analysis of de novo protein synthesis by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in the presence of [35S]-methionine disclosed that exogenous ABA does not impede protein biosynthesis during imbibition. Furthermore, imbibed D seeds proved competent for de novo protein synthesis, demonstrating that impediment of protein translation was not the cause of the observed block of seed germination. However, the two-dimensional protein profiles were markedly different from those obtained with the ND seeds imbibed in ABA. Altogether, the data showed that the mechanisms blocking germination of the ND seeds by ABA application are different from those preventing germination of the D seeds imbibed in basal medium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular Aspects of Seed Dormancy
Finkelstein, R., Reeves, W., Ariizumi, T., & Steber, C. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092740 · Cited by 1,379
Molecular networks regulating Arabidopsis seed maturation, after‐ripening, dormancy and germination
Holdsworth, M. J., Bentsink, L., & Soppe, W. J. J. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02437.x · Cited by 964
Completing the cycle: maternal effects as the missing link in plant life histories
Donohue, K. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0291 · Cited by 459
Seed quality and carbon primary metabolism.
Domergue, J., Abadie, C., Limami, A., Way, D., & Tcherkez, G. (2019) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.13618 · Cited by 66
Tétard-Jones, C., Edwards, M., Rempelos, L., Gatehouse, A., Eyre, M., Wilcockson, S., & Leifert, C. (2013) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy3010059 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Chibani, K., Ali-Rachedi, S., Job, C., Job, D., Jullien, M., & Grappin, P.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-10-06
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1493-1510
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2129723274
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proteomic Analysis of Seed Dormancy in Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.106.087452
- The paper
- Chibani, K., Ali-Rachedi, S., Job, C., Job, D., Jullien, M., & Grappin, P. (2006). Proteomic Analysis of Seed Dormancy in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.087452
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.