Cited by 14Agricultural Science and FertilizationPlant Growth and Agriculture TechniquesAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management

Effects of Previous Crop Management, Fertilization Regime and Water Supply on Potato Tuber Proteome and Yield

Open access
Tétard-Jones, Catherine, Edwards, Martin, Rempelos, Leonidas, Gatehouse, Angharad, Eyre, Mick, Wilcockson, Stephen, Leifert, Carlo·2013·Agronomy

Abstract

There is increasing concern about the sustainability and environmental impacts of mineral fertilizer use in agriculture. Increased recycling of nutrients via the use of animal and green manures and fertilizers made from domestic organic waste may reduce reliance on mineral fertilizers. However, the relative availability of nutrients (especially nitrogen) is lower in organic compared to mineral fertilizers, which can result in significantly lower yields in nutrient demanding crops such as potato. It is therefore important to gain a better understanding of the factors affecting nutrient use efficiency (yield per unit fertilizer input) from organic fertilizers. Here we show that (a) previous crop management (organic vs. conventional fertilization and crop protection regimes), (b) organic fertilizer type and rate (composted cattle manure vs. composted chicken manure pellets) and (c) watering regimes (optimized and restricted) significantly affected leaf chlorophyll content, potato tuber N-concentration, proteome and yield. Protein inference by gel matching indicated several functional groups significantly affected by previous crop management and organic fertilizer type and rate, including stress/defense response, glycolysis and protein destination and storage. These results indicate genomic pathways controlling crop responses (nutrient use efficiency and yield) according to contrasting types and rates of organic fertilizers that can be linked to the respective encoding genes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/agronomy3010059

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ceylan, S.; Mordogan, N.; Akdemir, H.; Cakici, H. Effect of organic fertilizers on some agronomic and chemical properties of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Asian J. Chem. 2006, 18, 1223-1230.
  2. Crawley, M.J. The R Book; John Wiley and Son: Chichester, UK, 2007.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tétard-Jones, C., Edwards, M., Rempelos, L., Gatehouse, A., Eyre, M., Wilcockson, S., & Leifert, C.
Affiliations
  • School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Molecular Agriculture Group, Nafferton Ecological Farming Group, Newcastle University, Nafferton Farm, Stocksfield, UK
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Venue
Agronomy
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2013-01-15
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
59-85
ISSN
2073-4395 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099498256
Cited by
14
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agronomy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
Keywords
potato, organic fertilization, mineral fertilizers, crop protection, cattle manure, water supply, nutrient use efficiency, chlorophyll content, glycolysis, protein storage, tuber yield

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review