The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differential Solute Regulation in Leaf Blades of Various Ages in Salt-Sensitive Wheat and a Salt-Tolerant Wheat x Lophopyrum elongatum (Host) A. Love Amphiploid
Open accessAbstract
Leaf blades of different ages from a salt-tolerant wheat x Lophopyrum elongatum (Host) A. Love (syn. Agropyron elongatum Host) amphiploid and its salt-sensitive wheat parent (Triticum aestivum L.cv Chinese Spring) were compared for their ionic relations, organic solute accumulation, and sap osmotic potential ([pi]sap). The plants were grown for 18 d in nonsaline (1.25 mM Na+) and salinized (200 mM NaCl) nutrient solutions. The response of leaf blades to NaCl salinity depended greatly on their age or position on the main stem. Na and proline levels were highest in the oldest leaf blade and progressively lower in younger ones. Glycine betaine and asparagine levels were highest in the youngest blade. The [pi]sap was similar for corresponding leaf blades of both genotypes, but contributions of various solutes to the difference in [pi]sap between blades from control and 200 mM NaCl treatments differed greatly. The NaCl-induced decline in [pi]sap of the youngest leaf blade of Chinese Spring was predominately due to the accumulation of Na and to a lesser extent asparagine; in the amphiploid, it was due to a combination of glycine betaine, K, Na, and asparagine. Proline contributed little in the youngest blade of either genotype. In the older blades Na was the major solute contributing to the decline in [pi]sap. Thus, the maintenance of low Na and high K levels and the accumulation of glycine betaine in the young leaf tissues contributed to the NaCl tolerance of the amphiploid. No such role was evident for proline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Na+ Tolerance and Na+ Transport in Higher Plants
TESTER, M. (2003) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcg058 · Cited by 3,250
Salinity tolerance in halophytes*
Flowers, T. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x · Cited by 2,789
Self-citationPotential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants
Ashraf, M., & Harris, P. J. C. (2004) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.024 · Cited by 2,044
Moradi, F., & Ismail, A. M. (2007) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcm052 · Cited by 713
Lea, P. J., Sodek, L., Parry, M. A. J., Shewry, P. R., & Halford, N. G. (2007) · Annals of Applied Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2006.00104.x · Cited by 665
Metadata
- Authors
- Colmer, T. D., Epstein, E., & Dvorak, J.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-08-01
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1715-1724
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2156113541
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential Solute Regulation in Leaf Blades of Various Ages in Salt-Sensitive Wheat and a Salt-Tolerant Wheat x Lophopyrum elongatum (Host) A. Love Amphiploid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.108.4.1715
- The paper
- Colmer, T. D., Epstein, E., & Dvorak, J. (1995). Differential Solute Regulation in Leaf Blades of Various Ages in Salt-Sensitive Wheat and a Salt-Tolerant Wheat x Lophopyrum elongatum (Host) A. Love Amphiploid. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.4.1715
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.