Molecular Mechanisms of Selenium Tolerance and Hyperaccumulation in Stanleya pinnata
Open accessAbstract
The molecular mechanisms responsible for selenium (Se) tolerance and hyperaccumulation were studied in the Se hyperaccumulator Stanleya pinnata (Brassicaceae) by comparing it with the related secondary Se accumulator Stanleya albescens using a combination of physiological, structural, genomic, and biochemical approaches. S. pinnata accumulated 3.6-fold more Se and was tolerant to 20 microm selenate, while S. albescens suffered reduced growth, chlorosis and necrosis, impaired photosynthesis, and high levels of reactive oxygen species. Levels of ascorbic acid, glutathione, total sulfur, and nonprotein thiols were higher in S. pinnata, suggesting that Se tolerance may in part be due to increased antioxidants and up-regulated sulfur assimilation. S. pinnata had higher selenocysteine methyltransferase protein levels and, judged from liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, mainly accumulated the free amino acid methylselenocysteine, while S. albescens accumulated mainly the free amino acid selenocystathionine. S. albescens leaf x-ray absorption near-edge structure scans mainly detected a carbon-Se-carbon compound (presumably selenocystathionine) in addition to some selenocysteine and selenate. Thus, S. albescens may accumulate more toxic forms of Se in its leaves than S. pinnata. The species also showed different leaf Se sequestration patterns: while S. albescens showed a diffuse pattern, S. pinnata sequestered Se in localized epidermal cell clusters along leaf margins and tips, concentrated inside of epidermal cells. Transcript analyses of S. pinnata showed a constitutively higher expression of genes involved in sulfur assimilation, antioxidant activities, defense, and response to (methyl)jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, or ethylene. The levels of some of these hormones were constitutively elevated in S. pinnata compared with S. albescens, and leaf Se accumulation was slightly enhanced in both species when these hormones were supplied. Thus, defense-related phytohormones may play an important signaling role in the Se hyperaccumulation of S. pinnata, perhaps by constitutively up-regulating sulfur/Se assimilation followed by methylation of selenocysteine and the targeted sequestration of methylselenocysteine.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rate of biotransformation from absorbed inorganic selenium to different organic forms in a plant is species specific and depends on specific biochemical pathways.
“The rate of biotransformation from absorbed inorganic Se to different organic forms of Se in a plant is species specific and depends on specific biochemical pathways [33].”
From Selenium Cycling Across Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Interfaces: A Critical Review (2015) · cites this paper as [33]
The mechanism underlying enhanced S assimilation may be upregulated expression of genes involved in S/Se assimilation, particularly ATP sulfurylase and APS reductase.
“The mechanism underlying the enhanced S assimilation may be upregulated expression of genes involved in S/Se assimilation, particularly ATP sulfurylase and APS reductase [33,180].”
From Selenium Cycling Across Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Interfaces: A Critical Review (2015) · cites this paper as [33]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 2 · Cited by 322
- Authors
- Freeman, J. L., Tamaoki, M., Stushnoff, C., Quinn, C. F., Cappa, J. J., Devonshire, J., Fakra, S. C., Marcus, M. A., McGrath, S. P., Van Hoewyk, D., & Pilon-Smits, E. A. H.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Freeman, John L.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-05-24
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1630-1652
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- PMC
- PMC2923907
- OpenAlex
- W1940300405
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 11.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0444471, 0817748)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Selenium in Biological Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica
- Keywords
- selenium hyperaccumulation, selenium tolerance, Stanleya pinnata, methylselenocysteine, sulfur assimilation, antioxidant defense, reactive oxygen species, plant hormone signaling, salicylic acid, ethylene, Brassicaceae
- MeSH terms
- Antioxidants, Chlorophyll, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Phenols, Selenium, Organoselenium Compounds, Reactive Oxygen Species, Plant Leaves, RNA, Plant, Brassicaceae, Gene Expression Profiling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review