The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of a Novel Aluminum Tolerance Phenotyping Platform Used for Comparisons of Cereal Aluminum Tolerance and Investigations into Rice Aluminum Tolerance Mechanisms
Open accessAbstract
The genetic and physiological mechanisms of aluminum (Al) tolerance have been well studied in certain cereal crops, and Al tolerance genes have been identified in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Rice (Oryza sativa) has been reported to be highly Al tolerant; however, a direct comparison of rice and other cereals has not been reported, and the mechanisms of rice Al tolerance are poorly understood. To facilitate Al tolerance phenotyping in rice, a high-throughput imaging system and root quantification computer program was developed, permitting quantification of the entire root system, rather than just the longest root. Additionally, a novel hydroponic solution was developed and optimized for Al tolerance screening in rice and compared with the Yoshida's rice solution commonly used for rice Al tolerance studies. To gain a better understanding of Al tolerance in cereals, comparisons of Al tolerance across cereal species were conducted at four Al concentrations using seven to nine genetically diverse genotypes of wheat, maize (Zea mays), sorghum, and rice. Rice was significantly more tolerant than maize, wheat, and sorghum at all Al concentrations, with the mean Al tolerance level for rice found to be 2- to 6-fold greater than that in maize, wheat, and sorghum. Physiological experiments were conducted on a genetically diverse panel of more than 20 rice genotypes spanning the range of rice Al tolerance and compared with two maize genotypes to determine if rice utilizes the well-described Al tolerance mechanism of root tip Al exclusion mediated by organic acid exudation. These results clearly demonstrate that the extremely high levels of rice Al tolerance are mediated by a novel mechanism, which is independent of root tip Al exclusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yu, J., Pressoir, G., Briggs, W. H., Vroh Bi, I., Yamasaki, M., Doebley, J. F., McMullen, M. D., Gaut, B. S., Nielsen, D. M., Holland, J. B., et al. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1702 · Cited by 4,133
Genomic Control for Association Studies
Devlin, B., & Roeder, K. (1999) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00997.x · Cited by 3,162 · cited 1×
“This can lead to confusion because trait or performance differences may be con founded with subpopulation structure, leading to false positives (type 1 error; Devlin and Roeder, 1999; Pritchard and Donnelly, 2001; Yu et al., 2006; Zhao et al., 2007).”
BackgroundHOW DO CROP PLANTS TOLERATE ACID SOILS? MECHANISMS OF ALUMINUM TOLERANCE AND PHOSPHOROUS EFFICIENCY
Kochian, L. V., Hoekenga, O. A., & Piñeros, M. A. (2004) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141655 · Cited by 1,819
Self-citationCellular Mechanisms of Aluminum Toxicity and Resistance in Plants
Kochian, L. V. (1995) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.46.1.237 · Cited by 1,737
Self-citationThe role of nutrient availability in regulating root architecture
López-Bucio, J., Cruz-Ramı́rez, A., & Herrera-Estrella, L. (2003) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(03)00035-9 · Cited by 1,522
F UNCTION AND M ECHANISM OF O RGANIC A NION E XUDATION FROM P LANT R OOTS
Ryan, P., Delhaize, E., & Jones, D. (2001) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.527 · Cited by 1,442
Aluminum Toxicity and Tolerance in Plants
Delhaize, E., & Ryan, P. R. (1995) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.107.2.315 · Cited by 1,346
Aluminium tolerance in plants and the complexing role of organic acids
Ma, J. F., Ryan, P. R., & Delhaize, E. (2001) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(01)01961-6 · Cited by 1,309
Global extent, development and economic impact of acid soils
von Uexküll, H. R., & Mutert, E. (1995) · Plant-Soil Interactions at Low pH: Principles and Management · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0221-6_1 · Cited by 1,222
Genetic Structure and Diversity in Oryza sativa L.
Garris, A. J., Tai, T. H., Coburn, J., Kresovich, S., & McCouch, S. (2005) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.104.035642 · Cited by 1,137
Self-citation
Cited by
Aluminum, a Friend or Foe of Higher Plants in Acid Soils
Bojórquez-Quintal, E., Escalante-Magaña, C., Echevarría-Machado, I., & Martínez-Estévez, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01767 · Cited by 544
Metadata
- Authors
- Famoso, A. N., Clark, R. T., Shaff, J. E., Craft, E., McCouch, S. R., & Kochian, L. V.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-06-10
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1678-1691
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2018012415
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 18.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a Novel Aluminum Tolerance Phenotyping Platform Used for Comparisons of Cereal Aluminum Tolerance and Investigations into Rice Aluminum Tolerance Mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.110.156794
- The paper
- Famoso, A. N., Clark, R. T., Shaff, J. E., Craft, E., McCouch, S. R., & Kochian, L. V. (2010). Development of a Novel Aluminum Tolerance Phenotyping Platform Used for Comparisons of Cereal Aluminum Tolerance and Investigations into Rice Aluminum Tolerance Mechanisms. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.156794
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.