Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 533

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Manipulation of Photoprotection to Improve Plant Photosynthesis

Open access
Murchie, Erik H., Niyogi, Krishna K.·2011·Plant Physiology

Abstract

Light is of course essential for photosynthesis and supports most life on earth. However, light intensity and spectral quality are highly variable in space and time according to time of day, season, geography, climate, and the position of leaf within canopy and cell within leaf. This has resulted in the evolution of a remarkable suite of processes within the photosynthetic system to accommodate these fluctuations. In fact, these regulatory mechanisms are tightly integrated with photosynthesis itself, and there is emerging evidence that when these processes are altered, the ability of plants to assimilate carbon over long time periods and to produce biomass may be affected. Photosynthesis begins with the absorption of light by chlorophyll, much of which is located in the light-harvesting complexes (LHCs) of PSII and PSI within the thylakoid membrane of chloroplasts. Chlorophyll enters its singlet excited state, and excitation energy is transferred to PSII and PSI reaction centers where charge separation occurs and photosynthetic electron transport is initiated. Electrons derived from water splitting ultimately reduce NADP+ to NADPH, and the transmembrane ƊpH is used to drive ATP generation by the chloroplastic ATP synthase. NADPH and ATP are then used in the Calvin-Benson cycle and other assimilatory reactions. In addition to this linear electron flow, there is flexibility in the electron transport system with multiple pathways and electron acceptors possible. These include cyclic electron transfer and oxygen as an electron acceptor. Absorbed solar energy may be defined as excessive when it exceeds the capacity of photosynthesis to use it for assimilation. Although excess light is potentially harmful, plants have a plethora of mechanisms that manage the excess absorbed energy on a molecular level in a way that does not result in photooxidative stress. Photoprotection is a rather broad term that can be used to cover mechanisms that prevent light energy from inducing damage via the generation of high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Although ROS are important signaling molecules in plants, they can have deleterious effects on photosynthesis and other leaf processes that ultimately will reduce growth and plant fitness. The most extreme example of this is photobleaching and cell death. Much of our current knowledge about photoprotection comes from studies of mutants and transformants of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and other plants in which the level of expression of key genes has been altered with subsequent changes to protein level, resulting in changes to the capacity and the kinetics of some photoprotective processes. This work has resulted in advances in understanding the mechanisms and the physiology of these processes. An exciting possibility is that manipulating photoprotective pathways is a means to enhance both stress resistance and photosynthetic productivity of crop plants. However, there may be a balance between the need for photoprotection to limit damage on the one hand and enhancing productivity on the other (Murchie et al., 2009). There seems to be much yet to learn: Here, we review the current state of photoprotection research focusing on mechanisms that are potential targets for manipulation to improve photosynthesis. The response of leaf photosynthesis to light is best demonstrated with a light response curve (Fig. 1). As light (photon flux density) increases, the rate of photosynthesis rises until it is saturated (A max). The slope of the initial linear portion of this curve is the maximum quantum yield (efficiency) of photosynthetic CO2 uptake (ΦCO2) or oxygen evolution (ΦO2). The maximum quantum yield of PSII can be estimated by the ratio of variable chlorophyll fluorescence to maximal fluorescence (F v/F m). A, A concept diagram describing the principle of photoprotection by distinguishing absorbed light used in photosynthesis from excess light that results in excitation energy that needs to be removed. B, A concept diagram describing the effect of photoinhibition on the quantum yield and light-saturated photosynthetic rate (A max). Note that although a reduction in A max is often cited as a product of PSII photoinhibition, in fact it may be caused by processes associated with photoinhibitory conditions other than PSII function, e.g. stomatal closure or Rubisco inactivation at high temperature. Hence, it is drawn as a dotted line. Plants are subject to a huge variety of factors that limit growth and photosynthetic rate. These can be imposed by the environment, such as water and nutrient deficiency and temperature, or they may be intrinsically enforced by low sink strength or a genetically determined growth rate. As a direct result, light may be frequently in excess of that required for CO2 assimilation, thereby necessitating photoprotective responses to avoid severe photoinhibition. As described in detail below, photoprotection includes mechanisms that regulate absorption an

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.110.168831

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 533

Metadata

Authors
Murchie, E. H., & Niyogi, K. K.
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
2010-11-17
Volume
155
Issue
1
Pages
86-92
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2115805227
Cited by
533
References
4
FWCI
6.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Manipulation of Photoprotection to Improve Plant Photosynthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.110.168831
The paper
Murchie, E. H., & Niyogi, K. K. (2011). Manipulation of Photoprotection to Improve Plant Photosynthesis. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.168831

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.