The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Decline of Leaf Hydraulic Conductance with Dehydration: Relationship to Leaf Size and Venation Architecture
Open accessAbstract
Across plant species, leaves vary enormously in their size and their venation architecture, of which one major function is to replace water lost to transpiration. The leaf hydraulic conductance (K leaf) represents the capacity of the transport system to deliver water, allowing stomata to remain open for photosynthesis. Previous studies showed that K leaf relates to vein density (vein length per area). Additionally, venation architecture determines the sensitivity of K leaf to damage; severing the midrib caused K leaf and gas exchange to decline, with lesser impacts in leaves with higher major vein density that provided more numerous water flow pathways around the damaged vein. Because xylem embolism during dehydration also reduces K leaf, we hypothesized that higher major vein density would also reduce hydraulic vulnerability. Smaller leaves, which generally have higher major vein density, would thus have lower hydraulic vulnerability. Tests using simulations with a spatially explicit model confirmed that smaller leaves with higher major vein density were more tolerant of major vein embolism. Additionally, for 10 species ranging strongly in drought tolerance, hydraulic vulnerability, determined as the leaf water potential at 50% and 80% loss of K leaf, was lower with greater major vein density and smaller leaf size (|r| = 0.85–0.90; P < 0.01). These relationships were independent of other aspects of physiological and morphological drought tolerance. These findings point to a new functional role of venation architecture and small leaf size in drought tolerance, potentially contributing to well-known biogeographic trends in leaf size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bartlett, M. K., Scoffoni, C., & Sack, L. (2012) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01751.x · Cited by 1,076
Self-citationSack, L., & Scoffoni, C. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12253 · Cited by 830
Self-citationPhotorespiration and the Evolution of C4Photosynthesis
Sage, R. F., Sage, T. L., & Kocacinar, F. (2012) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105511 · Cited by 759
Outside-Xylem Vulnerability, Not Xylem Embolism, Controls Leaf Hydraulic Decline during Dehydration
Scoffoni, C., Albuquerque, C., Brodersen, C. R., Townes, S. V., John, G. P., Bartlett, M. K., Buckley, T. N., McElrone, A. J., & Sack, L. (2017) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.16.01643 · Cited by 265
Self-citationWong, A. C. S., van Oosterom, E. J., Godwin, I. D., & Borrell, A. K. (2023) · AoB Plants · doi:10.1093/aobpla/plad040 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Scoffoni, C., Rawls, M., McKown, A., Cochard, H., & Sack, L.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-04-21
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 832-843
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1999578585
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decline of Leaf Hydraulic Conductance with Dehydration: Relationship to Leaf Size and Venation Architecture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.111.173856
- The paper
- Scoffoni, C., Rawls, M., McKown, A., Cochard, H., & Sack, L. (2011). Decline of Leaf Hydraulic Conductance with Dehydration: Relationship to Leaf Size and Venation Architecture. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.173856
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.