The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Control of Leaf Expansion: A Developmental Switch from Metabolics to Hydraulics
Open accessAbstract
Leaf expansion is the central process by which plants colonize space, allowing energy capture and carbon acquisition. Water and carbon emerge as main limiting factors of leaf expansion, but the literature remains controversial about their respective contributions. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the importance of hydraulics and metabolics is organized according to both dark/light fluctuations and leaf ontogeny. For this purpose, we established the developmental pattern of individual leaf expansion during days and nights in the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Under control conditions, decreases in leaf expansion were observed at night immediately after emergence, when starch reserves were lowest. These nocturnal decreases were strongly exaggerated in a set of starch mutants, consistent with an early carbon limitation. However, low-light treatment of wild-type plants had no influence on these early decreases, implying that expansion can be uncoupled from changes in carbon availability. From 4 d after leaf emergence onward, decreases of leaf expansion were observed in the daytime. Using mutants impaired in stomatal control of transpiration as well as plants grown under soil water deficit or high air humidity, we gathered evidence that these diurnal decreases were the signature of a hydraulic limitation that gradually set up as the leaf developed. Changes in leaf turgor were consistent with this pattern. It is concluded that during the course of leaf ontogeny, the predominant control of leaf expansion switches from metabolics to hydraulics. We suggest that the leaf is better armed to buffer variations in the former than in the latter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain
Monteith, J. L. (1977) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1977.0140 · Cited by 3,484
Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants
Boardman, N. K. (1977) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.28.060177.002035 · Cited by 1,826
Cited by
Carotti, L., Graamans, L., Puksic, F., Butturini, M., Meinen, E., Heuvelink, E., & Stanghellini, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.592171 · Cited by 128
Phytochrome Kinase Substrate 4 is phosphorylated by the phototropin 1 photoreceptor
Demarsy, E., Schepens, I., Okajima, K., Hersch, M., Bergmann, S., Christie, J., Shimazaki, K., Tokutomi, S., & Fankhauser, C. (2012) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.186 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Pantin, F., Simonneau, T., Rolland, G., Dauzat, M., & Muller, B.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-04-06
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 803-815
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2071674895
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control of Leaf Expansion: A Developmental Switch from Metabolics to Hydraulics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.111.176289
- The paper
- Pantin, F., Simonneau, T., Rolland, G., Dauzat, M., & Muller, B. (2011). Control of Leaf Expansion: A Developmental Switch from Metabolics to Hydraulics. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.176289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.