The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbe-Associated Molecular Patterns-Triggered Root Responses Mediate Beneficial Rhizobacterial Recruitment in Arabidopsis
Open accessAbstract
This study demonstrated that foliar infection by Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 induced malic acid (MA) transporter (ALUMINUM-ACTIVATED MALATE TRANSPORTER1 [ALMT1]) expression leading to increased MA titers in the rhizosphere of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). MA secretion in the rhizosphere increased beneficial rhizobacteria Bacillus subtilis FB17 (hereafter FB17) titers causing an induced systemic resistance response in plants against P. syringae pv tomato DC3000. Having shown that a live pathogen could induce an intraplant signal from shoot-to-root to recruit FB17 belowground, we hypothesized that pathogen-derived microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) may relay a similar response specific to FB17 recruitment. The involvement of MAMPs in triggering plant innate immune response is well studied in the plant’s response against foliar pathogens. In contrast, MAMPs-elicited plant responses on the roots and the belowground microbial community are not well understood. It is known that pathogen-derived MAMPs suppress the root immune responses, which may facilitate pathogenicity. Plants subjected to known MAMPs such as a flagellar peptide, flagellin22 (flg22), and a pathogen-derived phytotoxin, coronatine (COR), induced a shoot-to-root signal regulating ALMT1 for recruitment of FB17. Micrografts using either a COR-insensitive mutant (coi1) or a flagellin-insensitive mutant (fls2) as the scion and ALMT1pro:β-glucuronidase as the rootstock revealed that both COR and flg22 are required for a graft transmissible signal to recruit FB17 belowground. The data suggest that MAMPs-induced signaling to regulate ALMT1 is salicylic acid and JASMONIC ACID RESISTANT1 (JAR1)/JASMONATE INSENSITIVE1 (JIN1)/MYC2 independent. Interestingly, a cell culture filtrate of FB17 suppressed flg22-induced MAMPs-activated root defense responses, which are similar to suppression of COR-mediated MAMPs-activated root defense, revealing a diffusible bacterial component that may regulate plant immune responses. Further analysis showed that the biofilm formation in B. subtilis negates suppression of MAMPs-activated defense responses in roots. Moreover, B. subtilis suppression of MAMPs-activated root defense does require JAR1/JIN1/MYC2. The ability of FB17 to block the MAMPs-elicited signaling pathways related to antibiosis reflects a strategy adapted by FB17 for efficient root colonization. These experiments demonstrate a remarkable strategy adapted by beneficial rhizobacteria to suppress a host defense response, which may facilitate rhizobacterial colonization and host-mutualistic association.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease
Vlot, A. C., Dempsey, D. A., & Klessig, D. F. (2009) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.050908.135202 · Cited by 2,568
Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching
Gomez-Roldan, V., Fermas, S., Brewer, P. B., Puech-Pagès, V., Dun, E. A., Pillot, J.-P., Letisse, F., Matusova, R., Danoun, S., Portais, J.-C., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07271 · Cited by 2,281
Cited by
Impact of plant domestication on rhizosphere microbiome assembly and functions
Pérez-Jaramillo, J. E., Mendes, R., & Raaijmakers, J. M. (2016) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-015-0337-7 · Cited by 732
Plant root-microbe communication in shaping root microbiomes
Lareen, A., Burton, F., & Schäfer, P. (2016) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-015-0417-8 · Cited by 668
Mycorrhiza-induced resistance: more than the sum of its parts?
Cameron, D. D., Neal, A. L., van Wees, S. C. M., & Ton, J. (2013) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.06.004 · Cited by 558
The rhizosphere revisited: root microbiomics
Bakker, P. A. H. M., Berendsen, R. L., Doornbos, R. F., Wintermans, P. C. A., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00165 · Cited by 490
Networking in the Plant Microbiome
van der Heijden, M. G. A., & Hartmann, M. (2016) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002378 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Lakshmanan, V., Kitto, S. L., Caplan, J. L., Hsueh, Y.-H., Kearns, D. B., Wu, Y.-S., & Bais, H. P.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-09-12
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1642-1661
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1969904363
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbe-Associated Molecular Patterns-Triggered Root Responses Mediate Beneficial Rhizobacterial Recruitment in Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.112.200386
- The paper
- Lakshmanan, V., Kitto, S. L., Caplan, J. L., Hsueh, Y.-H., Kearns, D. B., Wu, Y.-S., & Bais, H. P. (2012). Microbe-Associated Molecular Patterns-Triggered Root Responses Mediate Beneficial Rhizobacterial Recruitment in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.200386
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.