The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Image-Based High-Throughput Field Phenotyping of Crop Roots
Open accessAbstract
Current plant phenotyping technologies to characterize agriculturally relevant traits have been primarily developed for use in laboratory and/or greenhouse conditions. In the case of root architectural traits, this limits phenotyping efforts, largely, to young plants grown in specialized containers and growth media. Hence, novel approaches are required to characterize mature root systems of older plants grown under actual soil conditions in the field. Imaging methods able to address the challenges associated with characterizing mature root systems are rare due, in part, to the greater complexity of mature root systems, including the larger size, overlap, and diversity of root components. Our imaging solution combines a field-imaging protocol and algorithmic approach to analyze mature root systems grown in the field. Via two case studies, we demonstrate how image analysis can be utilized to estimate localized root traits that reliably capture heritable architectural diversity as well as environmentally induced architectural variation of both monocot and dicot plants. In the first study, we show that our algorithms and traits (including 13 novel traits inaccessible to manual estimation) can differentiate nine maize (Zea mays) genotypes 8 weeks after planting. The second study focuses on a diversity panel of 188 cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) genotypes to identify which traits are sufficient to differentiate genotypes even when comparing plants whose harvesting date differs up to 14 d. Overall, we find that automatically derived traits can increase both the speed and reproducibility of the trait estimation pipeline under field conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms
Otsu, N. (1979) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1979.4310076 · Cited by 43,398
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943
Image analysis and mathematical morphology
(1982) · Computer Graphics and Image Processing · doi:10.1016/0146-664x(82)90078-8 · Cited by 8,151
Python for scientific computing
Oliphant, T. E. (2007) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.58 · Cited by 3,303 · cited 1×
“The online platform is implemented in PYTHON 2.7 (Van Rossum and Drake, 2009) using the libraries NumPy (Oliphant, 2006) and SciPy (Oliphant, 2007) to derive the statistics, Mahotas (Coelho, 2013) for image processing, and the graph library graph-tools (http://graph-tool.skewed.de).”
MethodInfluentialLaboratory manual for physiological studies of rice
Yoshida, S., Forno, D. A., & Cock, J. H. (1971) · International Rice Research Institute eBooks · Cited by 2,969
Root Architecture and Plant Productivity
Lynch, J. (1995) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.109.1.7 · Cited by 1,905
Self-citationField high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier
Araus, J. L., & Cairns, J. E. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.008 · Cited by 1,817 · cited 1×
“Indeed, high-throughput field phenotyping can be seen as a new frontier for crop improvement (Araus and Cairns, 2014) because imaging a mature root system under realistic field conditions poses unique challenges and opportunities (Gregory et al., 2009; Zhu et al., 2011; Pieruschka and Poorter,…”
BackgroundRobust Statistics: Theory and Methods
Maronna, R. A., Martin, R. D., & Yohai, V. J. (2006) · Cited by 1,715
Steep, cheap and deep: an ideotype to optimize water and N acquisition by maize root systems
Lynch, J. P. (2013) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcs293 · Cited by 1,385
Self-citationRoots of the Second Green Revolution
Lynch, J. P. (2007) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt06118 · Cited by 1,282
Self-citation
Cited by
Uncovering the hidden half of plants using new advances in root phenotyping
Atkinson, J. A., Pound, M. P., Bennett, M. J., & Wells, D. M. (2019) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2018.06.002 · Cited by 406
A review of computer vision technologies for plant phenotyping
Li, Z., Guo, R., Li, M., Chen, Y., & Li, G. (2020) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105672 · Cited by 391
Root Phenotyping for Drought Tolerance: A Review
Wasaya, A., Zhang, X., Fang, Q., & Yan, Z. (2018) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy8110241 · Cited by 334
Close range hyperspectral imaging of plants: A review
Mishra, P., Asaari, M. S. M., Herrero-Langreo, A., Lohumi, S., Diezma, B., & Scheunders, P. (2017) · Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.09.009 · Cited by 319
Biochar amendment increases maize root surface areas and branching: a shovelomics study in Zambia
Abiven, S., Hund, A., Martinsen, V., & Cornelissen, G. (2015) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-015-2533-2 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Bucksch, A., Burridge, J., York, L. M., Das, A., Nord, E., Weitz, J. S., & Lynch, J. P.
- Venue
- PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-09-03
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 470-486
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2057890665
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 27.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Image-Based High-Throughput Field Phenotyping of Crop Roots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.114.243519
- The paper
- Bucksch, A., Burridge, J., York, L. M., Das, A., Nord, E., Weitz, J. S., & Lynch, J. P. (2014). Image-Based High-Throughput Field Phenotyping of Crop Roots. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.243519
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.