The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tomato Polyphenol Oxidase (Differential Response of the Polyphenol Oxidase F Promoter to Injuries and Wound Signals)
Open accessAbstract
Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) polyphenol oxidases (PPOs) are encoded by a seven-member gene family that exhibits complex patterns of differential expression during growth and differentiation. Antisense down-regulation of constitutive and induced PPO expression results in hypersusceptibility to pathogens, suggesting a critical role for PPO-mediated phenolic oxidation in plant defense. However, the nature and extent of PPO induction and its contribution to resistance are unclear. In this study we examined the inducibility of the tomato PPO gene family. In mature plants PPO transcript levels systemically increased in young leaves (nodes 1–3) when mature leaflets (node 5) were injured. Transcripts hybridizing to PPO E/F-specific probes were the predominant wound-induced PPO mRNAs in young leaves. Analysis of PPO promoter: GUS fusion constructs shows that mechanical wounding and infection by fungal and bacterial pathogens induced transcription of PPO F. Different injuries, salicylic acid, ethylene, and jasmonates elicited distinct, cell-specific and developmental stage-specific patterns of PPO F expression. Whereas jasmonates and mechanical wounding significantly induced PPO F only in young leaves (nodes 1–3), and ethylene induced PPO F only in older leaves (node 7), salicylic acid induced PPO F in stems and foliage at all developmental stages. These results demonstrate that cis-element(s) sufficient for PPO F inducibility reside in the 5[prime] flanking region, and these elements are responsive to a broad range of signals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phenolic compounds and related enzymes as determinants of quality in fruits and vegetables
Tomás‐Barberán, F. A., & Espín, J. C. (2001) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.885 · Cited by 1,288
Bacillus species as versatile weapons for plant pathogens: a review
Shafi, J., Tian, H., & Ji, M. (2017) · Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment · doi:10.1080/13102818.2017.1286950 · Cited by 821
Li, L., Zhao, Y., McCaig, B. C., Wingerd, B. A., Wang, J., Whalon, M. E., Pichersky, E., & Howe, G. A. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.017954 · Cited by 673
PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND FUNCTION OF PLANT POLYPHENOL OXIDASE: A REVIEW
YORUK, R., & MARSHALL, M. R. (2003) · Journal of Food Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1745-4514.2003.tb00289.x · Cited by 594
Li, L., & Steffens, J. (2002) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-002-0750-4 · Cited by 558
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thipyapong, P., & Steffens, J. C.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 409-418
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1585368899
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tomato Polyphenol Oxidase (Differential Response of the Polyphenol Oxidase F Promoter to Injuries and Wound Signals). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.115.2.409
- The paper
- Thipyapong, P., & Steffens, J. C. (1997). Tomato Polyphenol Oxidase (Differential Response of the Polyphenol Oxidase F Promoter to Injuries and Wound Signals). Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.115.2.409
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.