The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oxidative Damage in Pea Plants Exposed to Water Deficit or Paraquat1
Open accessAbstract
The application of a moderate water deficit (water potential of −1.3 MPa) to pea (Pisum sativum L. cv Lincoln) leaves led to a 75% inhibition of photosynthesis and to increases in zeaxanthin, malondialdehyde, oxidized proteins, and mitochondrial, cytosolic, and chloroplastic superoxide dismutase activities. Severe water deficit (−1.9 MPa) almost completely inhibited photosynthesis, decreased chlorophylls, β-carotene, neoxanthin, and lutein, and caused further conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin, suggesting damage to the photosynthetic apparatus. There were consistent decreases in antioxidants and pyridine nucleotides, and accumulation of catalytic Fe, malondialdehyde, and oxidized proteins. Paraquat (PQ) treatment led to similar major decreases in photosynthesis, water content, proteins, and most antioxidants, and induced the accumulation of zeaxanthin and damaged proteins. PQ decreased markedly ascorbate, NADPH, ascorbate peroxidase, and chloroplastic Fe-superoxide dismutase activity, and caused major increases in oxidized glutathione, NAD+, NADH, and catalytic Fe. It is concluded that, in cv Lincoln, the increase in catalytic Fe and the lowering of antioxidant protection may be involved in the oxidative damage caused by severe water deficit and PQ, but not necessarily in the incipient stress induced by moderate water deficit. Results also indicate that the tolerance to water deficit in terms of oxidative damage largely depends on the legume cultivar.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hydrogen Peroxide is Scavenged by Ascorbate-specific Peroxidase in Spinach Chloroplasts
Nakano, Y., & Asada, K. (1981) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076232 · Cited by 10,809
Cited by
Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants
Alscher, R. G. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/53.372.1331 · Cited by 2,771
Diffusive and Metabolic Limitations to Photosynthesis under Drought and Salinity in C 3 Plants
Flexas, J., Bota, J., Loreto, F., Cornic, G., & Sharkey, T. D. (2004) · Plant Biology · doi:10.1055/s-2004-820867 · Cited by 1,467
Borsani, O., Valpuesta, V., & Botella, M. A. (2001) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.126.3.1024 · Cited by 855
Shalata, A., Mittova, V., Volokita, M., Guy, M., & Tal, M. (2001) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1120405.x · Cited by 448
The xanthophyll cycle activity in kidney bean and cabbage leaves under salinity stress
Misra, A. N., Latowski, D., & Strzalka, K. (2006) · Russian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1134/s1021443706010134 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Escuredo, P. R., Arrese-Igor, C., & Becana, M.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 173-181
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1991361693
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oxidative Damage in Pea Plants Exposed to Water Deficit or Paraquat1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.116.1.173
- The paper
- Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Escuredo, P. R., Arrese-Igor, C., & Becana, M. (1998). Oxidative Damage in Pea Plants Exposed to Water Deficit or Paraquat1. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.116.1.173
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.