The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of Cold-Responsive Genes in Plant Freezing Tolerance1
Abstract
Plants vary greatly in their ability to survive freezing temperatures. At one extreme are plants from tropical regions that have virtually no capacity to survive even the slightest freeze. In contrast, herbaceous plants from temperate regions generally survive freezing temperatures ranging from −5°C to −30°C, depending on the species, whereas perennials in the boreal forests routinely survive winter temperatures below −30°C. Significantly, the maximum freezing tolerance of plants is not “constitutive” but is induced in response to low, nonfreezing temperatures (below approximately 10°C), a phenomenon known as “cold acclimation.” Wheat plants grown at normal warm temperatures, for instance, are killed by freezing at about −5°C, but after cold acclimation, they can survive freezing temperatures as low as −20°C. What accounts for the differences in freezing tolerance among plant species and the increase in freezing tolerance that occurs with cold acclimation? Determining the answers to these questions is not only of basic scientific interest, but also has potential practical applications. Freezing temperatures periodically cause significant losses in plant productivity and limit the geographical locations where crop and horticultural plant species can be grown. Despite considerable effort, traditional breeding approaches have resulted in only modest improvements of freezing tolerance. For example, the freezing tolerance of the most hardy wheat varieties today is essentially the same as that of varieties developed in the early part of this century (Thomashow, 1990). Knowledge of the molecular basis of freezing tolerance and the cold acclimation process could potentially lead to the development of new strategies to improve plant freezing tolerance and result in increased plant productivity and expanded areas of agricultural production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stockinger, E. J., Gilmour, S. J., & Thomashow, M. F. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.3.1035 · Cited by 1,807
Self-citation
Cited by
Gilmour, S. J., Sebolt, A. M., Salazar, M. P., Everard, J. D., & Thomashow, M. F. (2000) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.124.4.1854 · Cited by 1,085
Self-citationImpacts of chilling temperatures on photosynthesis in warm-climate plants.
Allen, D. J., & Ort, D. R. (2001) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01808-2 · Cited by 1,047
Membrane fluidity and its roles in the perception of environmental signals
Los, D. A., & Murata, N. (2004) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.08.002 · Cited by 1,020
Transcription Factor CBF4 Is a Regulator of Drought Adaptation in Arabidopsis
Haake, V., Cook, D., Riechmann, J., Pineda, O., Thomashow, M. F., & Zhang, J. Z. (2002) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.006478 · Cited by 760
Self-citationDai, X., Xu, Y., Ma, Q., Xu, W., Wang, T., Xue, Y., & Chong, K. (2007) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.106.094532 · Cited by 594
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomashow, M. F.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-09-01
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2007866932
- Cited by
- 701
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Cold-Responsive Genes in Plant Freezing Tolerance1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.118.1.1
- The paper
- Thomashow, M. F. (1998). Role of Cold-Responsive Genes in Plant Freezing Tolerance1. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.118.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.