The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Starch and the Control of Kernel Number in Maize at Low Water Potentials
Open accessAbstract
After reproduction is initiated in plants, subsequent reproductive development is sometimes interrupted, which decreases the final number of seeds and fruits. We subjected maize (Zea mays L.) to low water potentials (ψw) that frequently cause this kind of failure. We observed metabolite pools and enzyme activities in the developing ovaries while we manipulated the sugar stream by feeding sucrose (Suc) to the stems. Low ψw imposed for 5 d around pollination allowed embryos to form, but abortion occurred and kernel number decreased markedly. The ovary contained starch that nearly disappeared during this abortion. Analyses showed that all of the intermediates in starch synthesis were depleted. However, when labeled Suc was fed to the stems, label arrived at the ovaries. Solute accumulated and caused osmotic adjustment. Suc accumulated, but other intermediates did not, showing that a partial block in starch synthesis occurred at the first step in Suc utilization. This step was mediated by invertase, which had low activity. Because of the block, Suc feeding only partially prevented starch disappearance and abortion. These results indicate that young embryos abort when the sugar stream is interrupted sufficiently to deplete starch during early ovary development, and this abortion results in a loss of mature seeds and fruits. At low ψw, maintaining the sugar stream partially prevented the abortion, but invertase regulated the synthesis of ovary starch and partially prevented full recovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Crop production under drought and heat stress: plant responses and management options.
Fahad, S., Bajwa, A. A., Nazir, U., Anjum, S. A., Farooq, A., Zohaib, A., Sadia, S., Nasim, W., Adkins, S., Saud, S., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01147 · Cited by 2,629
The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals
BARNABÁS, B., JÄGER, K., & FEHÉR, A. (2008) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01727.x · Cited by 2,066
Plant Drought Stress: Effects, Mechanisms and Management
Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D., & Basra, S. M. A. (2009) · Sustainable Agriculture · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_12 · Cited by 1,496
Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics
Cattivelli, L., Rizza, F., Badeck, F.-W., Mazzucotelli, E., Mastrangelo, A. M., Francia, E., Marè, C., Tondelli, A., & Stanca, A. M. (2008) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.004 · Cited by 1,433
Hammer, G. L., Dong, Z., McLean, G., Doherty, A., Messina, C., Schussler, J., Zinselmeier, C., Paszkiewicz, S., & Cooper, M. (2009) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2008.03.0152 · Cited by 745
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zinselmeier, C., Jeong, B.-R., & Boyer, J. S.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-09-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-36
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2136801949
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Starch and the Control of Kernel Number in Maize at Low Water Potentials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.121.1.25
- The paper
- Zinselmeier, C., Jeong, B.-R., & Boyer, J. S. (1999). Starch and the Control of Kernel Number in Maize at Low Water Potentials. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.121.1.25
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.