Cited by 54

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Correlations between Circadian Rhythms and Growth in Challenging Environments

Dakhiya, Yuri, Hussien, Duaa, Fridman, Eyal, Kiflawi, Moshe, Green, Rachel·2017·Plant Physiology

Abstract

In plants, the circadian system controls a plethora of processes, many with agronomic importance, such as photosynthesis, photoprotection, stomatal opening, and photoperiodic development, as well as molecular processes, such as gene expression. It has been suggested that modifying circadian rhythms may be a means to manipulate crops to develop improved plants for agriculture. However, there is very little information on how the clock influences the performance of crop plants. We used a noninvasive, high-throughput technique, based on prompt chlorophyll fluorescence, to measure circadian rhythms and demonstrated that the technique works in a range of plants. Using fluorescence, we analyzed circadian rhythms in populations of wild barley ( Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum ) from widely different ecogeographical locations in the Southern Levant part of the Fertile Crescent, an area with a high proportion of the total genetic variation of wild barley. Our results show that there is variability for circadian traits in the wild barley lines. We observed that circadian period lengths were correlated with temperature and aspect at the sites of origin of the plants, while the amplitudes of the rhythms were correlated with soil composition. Thus, different environmental parameters may exert selection on circadian rhythms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.17.00057

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 54

Metadata

Authors
Dakhiya, Y., Hussien, D., Fridman, E., Kiflawi, M., & Green, R.
Affiliations
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Silberman Institute for Life Sciences, Hebrew University, Givat Ram, Jerusalem 91904, Israel (D.H., Y.D., R.G.);
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
2017-01-30
Volume
173
Issue
3
Pages
1724-1734
ISSN
  • 0032-0889
  • 1532-2548
Cited by
54
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review