The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transcriptome Analysis Identifies a Zinc Finger Protein Regulating Starch Degradation in Kiwifruit
Open accessAbstract
Ripening, including softening, is a critical factor in determining the postharvest shelf-life of fruit and is controlled by enzymes involved in cell wall metabolism, starch degradation, and hormone metabolism. Here, we used a transcriptomics-based approach to identify transcriptional regulatory components associated with texture, ethylene, and starch degradation in ripening kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa). Twelve differentially expressed structural genes, including seven involved in cell wall metabolism, four in ethylene biosynthesis, and one in starch degradation, and 14 transcription factors (TFs) induced by exogenous ethylene treatment and inhibited by the ethylene signaling inhibitor 1-methylcyclopropene were identified as changing in transcript levels during ripening. Moreover, analysis of the regulatory effects of differentially expressed genes identified a zinc finger TF, DNA BINDING WITH ONE FINGER (AdDof3), which showed significant transactivation on the AdBAM3L (β-amylase) promoter. AdDof3 interacted physically with the AdBAM3L promoter, and stable overexpression of AdBAM3L resulted in lower starch content in transgenic kiwifruit leaves, suggesting that AdBAM3L is a key gene for starch degradation. Moreover, transient overexpression analysis showed that AdDof3 up-regulated AdBAM3L expression in kiwifruit. Thus, transcriptomics analysis not only allowed the prediction of some ripening-regulating genes but also facilitated the characterization of a TF, AdDof3, and a key structural gene, AdBAM3L, in starch degradation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trapnell, C., Williams, B. A., Pertea, G., Mortazavi, A., Kwan, G., van Baren, M. J., Salzberg, S. L., Wold, B. J., & Pachter, L. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1621 · Cited by 15,556
Kim, D., Pertea, G., Trapnell, C., Pimentel, H., Kelley, R., & Salzberg, S. L. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36 · Cited by 12,668
New method for quantitative determination of uronic acids
Blumenkrantz, N., & Asboe-Hansen, G. (1973) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(73)90377-1 · Cited by 7,140
Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias
Young, M. D., Wakefield, M. J., Smyth, G. K., & Oshlack, A. (2010) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14 · Cited by 7,107
Cited by
Wang, R., Shu, P., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Du, K., Xie, Y., Li, M., Ma, T., et al. (2022) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17618 · Cited by 283
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, A.-D., Wang, W.-Q., Tong, Y., Li, M.-J., Grierson, D., Ferguson, I., Chen, K.-S., & Yin, X.-R.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-08-22
- Volume
- 178
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 850-863
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2888728457
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcriptome Analysis Identifies a Zinc Finger Protein Regulating Starch Degradation in Kiwifruit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.18.00427
- The paper
- Zhang, A.-D., Wang, W.-Q., Tong, Y., Li, M.-J., Grierson, D., Ferguson, I., Chen, K.-S., & Yin, X.-R. (2018). Transcriptome Analysis Identifies a Zinc Finger Protein Regulating Starch Degradation in Kiwifruit. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.00427
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.