The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Penetration of Stomata by Liquids: Dependence on Surface Tension, Wettability, and Stomatal Morphology
Open accessAbstract
Wettability of the leaf surface, surface tension of the liquid, and stomatal morphology control penetration of stomata by liquids. The critical surface tension of the lower leaf surface of Zebrina purpusii Brückn. was estimated to be 25 to 30 dyne cm(-1). Liquids having a surface tension less than 30 dyne cm(-1) gave zero contact angle on the leaf surface and infiltrated stomata spontaneously while liquids having a surface tension greater than 30 dyne cm(-1) did not wet the leaf surface and failed to infiltrate stomata. Considering stomata as conical capillaries, we were able to show that with liquids giving a finite contact angle, infiltration depended solely on the relationship between the magnitude of the contact angle and the wall angle of the aperture. Generally, spontaneous infiltration of stomata will take place when the contact angle is smaller than the wall angle of the aperture wall. The degree of stomatal opening (4, 6, 8, or 10 mum) was of little importance. Cuticular ledges present at the entrance to the outer vestibule and between the inner vestibule and substomatal chamber resulted in very small if not zero wall angles, and thus played a major role in excluding water from the intercellular space of leaves. We show why the degree of stomatal opening cannot be assessed by observing spontaneous infiltration of stomata by organic liquids of low surface tension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATER
Wenzel, R. N. (1936) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ie50320a024 · Cited by 13,316
A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy
Spurr, A. R. (1969) · Journal of Ultrastructure Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-5320(69)90033-1 · Cited by 12,865
A METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SURFACE AND INTERFACIAL TENSION FROM THE MAXIMUM PULL ON A RING
Harkins, W. D., & Jordan, H. F. (1930) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01368a004 · Cited by 530
Leaf structure as related to absorption of pesticides and other compounds
Hull, H. M. (1970) · Residue Reviews / Rückstands-Berichte · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-8461-2_1 · Cited by 173
Quantitative studies on the wetting of leaves by water
Fogg, G. E. (1947) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1947.0028 · Cited by 153
Cited by
Avellan, A., Yun, J., Morais, B. P., Clement, E. T., Rodrigues, S. M., & Lowry, G. V. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c00178 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Schönherr, J., & Bukovac, M. J.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1972-05-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 813-819
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1968358148
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Penetration of Stomata by Liquids: Dependence on Surface Tension, Wettability, and Stomatal Morphology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.49.5.813
- The paper
- Schönherr, J., & Bukovac, M. J. (1972). Penetration of Stomata by Liquids: Dependence on Surface Tension, Wettability, and Stomatal Morphology. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.49.5.813
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.