Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 42Photosynthetic Processes and MechanismsResearch in Cotton CultivationLeaf Properties and Growth Measurement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High photosynthetic rate of a chlorophyll mutant of cotton.

Open access
Benedict, C. R., McCree, K. J., Kohel, R. J.·1972·Plant Physiology

Abstract

In a chlorophyll mutant (virescent) and wild-type cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), a number of photosynthetic parameters have been measured and compared with those published for other chlorophyll mutants. (a) The photosynthetic rates at 230 w/m(2) (400-700 nm) from a tungsten lamp were 36.8 mg CO(2) fixed/dm(2).hr (virescent) and 39.5 mg CO(2) fixed/dm(2).hr (wild-type). On a chlorphyll basis, the photosynthetic rates were 36.8 and 12.1 mg CO(2) fixed/mg chl.hr, respectively. (b) The photosynthetic rates at 13 w/m(2) (400-700 nm) from a tungsten source were 7.1 mg CO(2) fixed/dm(2).hr (virescent) and 7.4 mg CO(2) fixed/dm(2).hr (wild-type). On a chlorophyll basis, the photosynthetic rates were 6.0 and 1.4 mg CO(2) fixed/mg chl.hr, respectively. (c) The chlorophyll a/b ratios of the virescent and wild-type leaves were 3.3 and 4.1 (d) The chlorophyll/carotenoid ratios for the virescent and wild-type leaves were 3.2 and 7.3, respectively. (e) The photosynthetic carbon metabolism of the chlorophyll mutant was through the reductive pentose phosphate cycle. (f) The CO(2) compensation points for the virescent and wild-type plants were similar. (g) The mutant and wild-type leaves have the same quantum yield in the red part of the visible spectrum, but the virescent leaves have a lower quantum yield in the blue part of the spectrum. (h) Virescent and wild-type leaves contain similar levels on a protein basis of several reductive pentose phosphate cycle enzymes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.49.6.968

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

See all 42

Metadata

Authors
Benedict, C. R., McCree, K. J., & Kohel, R. J.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
1972-06-01
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
968-971
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2027155826
Cited by
42
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Agricultural Research Service
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Research in Cotton Cultivation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
Keywords
chlorophyll mutants, cotton, Gossypium hirsutum, photosynthetic rate, CO2 fixation, chlorophyll a/b ratio, Calvin cycle, photosynthetic carbon metabolism, quantum yield, CO2 compensation point

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High photosynthetic rate of a chlorophyll mutant of cotton. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.49.6.968
The paper
Benedict, C. R., McCree, K. J., & Kohel, R. J. (1972). High photosynthetic rate of a chlorophyll mutant of cotton. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.49.6.968