The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Chitosan on Membrane Permeability of Suspension-Cultured Glycine max and Phaseolus vulgaris Cells
Open accessAbstract
Treatment of suspension-cultured Glycine max cv Harosoy 63 cells with soluble chitosan (20-500 micrograms per milliliter) increased membrane permeability as shown by leakage of electrolytes, protein, and UV absorbing material. Severe damage to the cell membrane by chitosan (100 and 500 mug/ml) was also indicated by reduced staining with fluorescein diacetate and the leakage of fluorescein from preloaded cells. Other basic polymers (poly-l-lysine, histone, DEAE-dextran, protamine sulfate, and glycol chitosan) also increased permeability, whereas the basic monomers l-lysine and d-glucosamine, and acidic or neutral polymers were not active. Chitosan-induced leakage was inhibited by divalent cations, the order of effectiveness being Ba(2+) > Ca(2+) > Sr(2+) > Mg(2+). Na polygalacturonate and Na poly-l-aspartate also reduced polycation-induced leakage, probably by formation of polycation-polyanion complexes. A chitosan-polygalacturonate complex precipitated on mixing solutions of the two polymers containing approximately equal numbers of galacturonate and glucosamine residues, but not with either polymer in excess. A similar concentration-dependent precipitation of chitosan by Na poly-l-aspartate was found. Leakage from Phaseolus vulgaris cv Grandessa cells was also induced by chitosan, and was inhibited by Ca(2+) and Na polygalacturonate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Devlieghere, F., Vermeulen, A., & Debevere, J. (2004) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2004.02.008 · Cited by 908
Lim, S.-H., & Hudson, S. M. (2004) · Carbohydrate Research · doi:10.1016/j.carres.2003.10.024 · Cited by 710
Kendra, D. F., & Hadwiger, L. A. (1984) · Experimental Mycology · doi:10.1016/0147-5975(84)90013-6 · Cited by 411
Oligosaccharins: structures and signal transduction
C�t�, F., & Hahn, M. G. (1994) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00016481 · Cited by 386
Effects of Chitosan on Candida albicans: Conditions for Its Antifungal Activity
Peña, A., Sánchez, N. S., & Calahorra, M. (2013) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2013/527549 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, D. H., Köhle, H., & Kauss, H.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1982-11-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1449-1454
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2029949389
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Chitosan on Membrane Permeability of Suspension-Cultured Glycine max and Phaseolus vulgaris Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.70.5.1449
- The paper
- Young, D. H., Köhle, H., & Kauss, H. (1982). Effect of Chitosan on Membrane Permeability of Suspension-Cultured Glycine max and Phaseolus vulgaris Cells. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.70.5.1449
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.