The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Photosynthetic and Stomatal Responses of Two Mangrove Species, Aegiceras corniculatum and Avicennia marina, to Long Term Salinity and Humidity Conditions
Open accessAbstract
Gas exchange characteristics were studied in two mangrove species, Aegiceras corniculatum (L.) Blanco and Avicennia marina (Forstk.) Vierh. var australasica (Walp.) Moldenke, grown under a variety of salinity and humidity conditions. The assimilation rate was measured as a function of the intercellular CO(2) concentration [A(c(i)) curve]. The photosynthetic capacity decreased with increase in salinity from 50 to 500 millimolar NaCl, as shown by decline in both the initial linear slope and the upper plateau of the A(c(i)) curve, with A. corniculatum being the more sensitive species. The decline in photosynthetic capacity was enhanced by increase in the leaf to air vapor pressure difference from 6 to 24 millibars, but this treatment caused a decrease in only the upper plateau of the A(c(i)) curve. Stomatal conductance was such that the intercellular CO(2) concentration obtaining under normal atmospheric conditions occurred near the transition between the lower linear and upper plateau portions of the A(c(i)) curves. Thus, stomatal conductance and photosynthetic capacity together co-limited the assimilation rate, which declined with increasing salinity and decreasing humidity. The marginal water cost of carbon assimilation was similar in most treatments, despite variation in the water loss/carbon gain ratio.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Salinity Effects on Leaf Anatomy: Consequences for Photosynthesis
Longstreth, D. J., & Nobel, P. S. (1979) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.63.4.700 · Cited by 266
Effects of Phosphorus Deficiency on the Photosynthesis and Respiration of Leaves of Sugar Beet
Terry, N., & Ulrich, A. (1973) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.51.1.43 · Cited by 210
Leaf Conductance in Relation to Assimilation in Eucalyptus pauciflora Sieb. ex Spreng
Wong, S. C., Cowan, I. R., & Farquhar, G. D. (1978) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.62.4.670 · Cited by 188
Self-citationResponses of Atriplex spongiosa and Suaeda monoica to Salinity
Storey, R., & Jones, R. G. W. (1979) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.63.1.156 · Cited by 168
Ball, M. C., & Farquhar, G. D. (1984) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.74.1.7 · Cited by 153
Self-citationCollatz, G. J. (1977) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00384961 · Cited by 46
Cited by
Seemann, J. R., & Critchley, C. (1985) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00396077 · Cited by 509
Salt tolerance mechanisms in mangroves: a review
Parida, A. K., & Jha, B. (2010) · Trees · doi:10.1007/s00468-010-0417-x · Cited by 454
An Empirical Model of Stomatal Conductance
Farquhar, G., & Wong, S. (1984) · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1071/pp9840191 · Cited by 448
Self-citationSalinity Tolerance in Brassica Oilseeds
Ashraf, M., & McNeilly, T. (2004) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680490433286 · Cited by 356
von Caemmerer, S., & Farquhar, G. D. (1984) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00393413 · Cited by 288
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ball, M. C., & Farquhar, G. D.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984-01-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2042104453
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 22.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.