Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 992

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for a Specific Uptake System for Iron Phytosiderophores in Roots of Grasses

Open access
Römheld, Volker, Marschner, Horst·1986·Plant Physiology

Abstract

Roots of grasses in response to iron deficiency markedly increase the release of chelating substances (;phytosiderophores') which are highly effective in solubilization of sparingly soluble inorganic Fe(III) compounds by formation of Fe(III)phytosiderophores. In barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), the rate of iron uptake from Fe(III)phytosiderophores is 100 to 1000 times faster than the rate from synthetic Fe chelates (e.g. Fe ethylenediaminetetraacetate) or microbial Fe siderophores (e.g. ferrichrome). Reduction of Fe(III) is not involved in the preferential iron uptake from Fe(III)phytosiderophores by barley. This is indicated by experiments with varied pH, addition of bicarbonate or of a strong chelator for Fe(II) (e.g. batho-phenanthrolinedisulfonate). The results indicate the existence of a specific uptake system for Fe(III)phytosiderophores in roots of barley and all other graminaceous species. In contrast to grasses, cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus L.) take up iron from Fe(III)phytosiderophores at rates similar to those from synthetic Fe chelates. Furthermore, under Fe deficiency in cucumber, increased rates of uptake of Fe(III)phytosiderophores are based on the same mechanism as for synthetic Fe chelates, namely enhanced Fe(III) reduction and chelate splitting. Two strategies are evident from the experiments for the acquisition of iron by plants under iron deficiency. Strategy I (in most nongraminaceous species) is characterized by an inducible plasma membrane-bound reductase and enhancement of H(+) release. Strategy II (in grasses) is characterized by enhanced release of phytosiderophores and by a highly specific uptake system for Fe(III)phytosiderophores. Strategy II seems to have several ecological advantages over Strategy I such as solubilization of sparingly soluble inorganic Fe(III) compounds in the rhizosphere, and less inhibition by high pH. The principal differences in the two strategies have to be taken into account in screening methods for resistance to ;lime chlorosis'.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.80.1.175

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 992

Metadata

Authors
Römheld, V., & Marschner, H.
Venue
Plant Physiology
Published
1986-01-01
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
175-180
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
OpenAlex
W2070831559
Cited by
992
References
19
FWCI
30.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for a Specific Uptake System for Iron Phytosiderophores in Roots of Grasses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.80.1.175
The paper
Römheld, V., & Marschner, H. (1986). Evidence for a Specific Uptake System for Iron Phytosiderophores in Roots of Grasses. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.80.1.175

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.