Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 567

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Physiological aspect of mugineic acid, a possible phytosiderophore of graminaceous plants

Takagi, Sei‐ichi, Nomoto, Kyosuke, Takemoto, Tsunematsu·1984·Journal of Plant Nutrition

Abstract

A natural chelator designated mugineic acid (MA) was isolated from the root washings of barley cultivar “Minorimugi”;. The secretion of MA by barley roots occurred in the morning, and was much enhanced under Fe stress. MA enhanced the solubility of Fe(III) between pH 4 and 9. When added to nutrient solutions, MA strongly stimulated the uptake of Fe by “Fe‐inefficient”; rice seedlings. Commonly used chelating agents such as EDTA, EDDHA, citrate, etc. had no stimulative effects. The MA‐mediated Fe uptake proved to be dependent on metabolic energy. These results suggest the possibility of MA functioning as a phytosiderophore for graminaceous plants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01904168409363213

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 567

Metadata

Authors
Takagi, S., Nomoto, K., & Takemoto, T.
Venue
Journal of Plant Nutrition
Published
1984-01
Volume
7
Issue
1-5
Pages
469-477
ISSN
  • 0190-4167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4087
OpenAlex
W2106365596
Cited by
567
References
0
FWCI
13.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiological aspect of mugineic acid, a possible phytosiderophore of graminaceous plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01904168409363213
The paper
Takagi, S., Nomoto, K., & Takemoto, T. (1984). Physiological aspect of mugineic acid, a possible phytosiderophore of graminaceous plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904168409363213

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.