The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Nitrogen Use Efficiency of C3 and C4 Plants: III. Leaf Nitrogen Effects on the Activity of Carboxylating Enzymes in Chenopodium album (L.) and Amaranthus retroflexus (L.)
Open accessAbstract
The relationships between leaf nitrogen content per unit area (N(a)) and (a) the initial slope of the photosynthetic CO(2) response curve, (b) activity and amount of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC), and (c) chlorophyll content were studied in the ecologically similar weeds Chenopodium album (C(3)) and Amaranthus retroflexus (C(4)). In both species, all parameters were linearly dependent upon leaf N(a). The dependence of the initial slope of the CO(2) response of photosynthesis on N(a) was four times greater in A. retroflexus than in C. album. At equivalent leaf N(a) contents, C. album had 1.5 to 2.6 times more CO(2) saturated Rubisco activity than A. retroflexus. At equal assimilation capacities, C. album had four times the Rubisco activity as A. retroflexus. In A. retroflexus, a one to one ratio between Rubisco activity and photosynthesis was observed, whereas in C. album, the CO(2) saturated Rubisco activity was three to four times the corresponding photosynthetic rate. The ratio of PEPC to Rubisco activity in A. retroflexus ranged from four at low N(a) to seven at high N(a). The fraction of organic N invested in carboxylation enzymes increased with increased N(a) in both species. The fraction of N invested in Rubisco ranged from 10 to 27% in C. album. In A. retroflexus, the fraction of N(a) invested in Rubisco ranged from 5 to 9% and the fraction invested in PEPC ranged from 2 to 5%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants
Evans, J. R. (1989) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00377192 · Cited by 3,400
Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE
Leakey, A. D. B., Ainsworth, E. A., Bernacchi, C. J., Rogers, A., Long, S. P., & Ort, D. R. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erp096 · Cited by 1,678
Evans, J. R., & Poorter, H. (2001) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00724.x · Cited by 1,229
The temperature response of C 3 and C 4 photosynthesis
SAGE, R. F., & KUBIEN, D. S. (2007) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01682.x · Cited by 1,127
Self-citationEvolutionary and Ecological Aspects of Photosynthetic Pathway Variation
Ehleringer, J. R., & Monson, R. K. (1993) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.24.1.411 · Cited by 836
Metadata
- Authors
- Sage, R. F., Pearcy, R. W., & Seemann, J. R.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987-10-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 355-359
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2001350202
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Nitrogen Use Efficiency of C3 and C4 Plants: III. Leaf Nitrogen Effects on the Activity of Carboxylating Enzymes in Chenopodium album (L.) and Amaranthus retroflexus (L.). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.85.2.355
- The paper
- Sage, R. F., Pearcy, R. W., & Seemann, J. R. (1987). The Nitrogen Use Efficiency of C3 and C4 Plants: III. Leaf Nitrogen Effects on the Activity of Carboxylating Enzymes in Chenopodium album (L.) and Amaranthus retroflexus (L.). Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.85.2.355
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.