The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antifungal Hydrolases in Pea Tissue: II. Inhibition of Fungal Growth by Combinations of Chitinase and β-1,3-Glucanase
Open accessAbstract
Chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase purified from pea pods acted synergistically in the degradation of fungal cell walls. The antifungal potential of the two enzymes was studied directly by adding protein preparations to paper discs placed on agar plates containing germinated fungal spores. Protein extracts from pea pods infected with Fusarium solani f.sp. phaseoli, which contained high activities of chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase, inhibited growth of 15 out of 18 fungi tested. Protein extracts from uninfected pea pods, which contained low activities of chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase, did not inhibit fungal growth. Purified chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase, tested individually, did not inhibit growth of most of the test fungi. Only Trichoderma viride was inhibited by chitinase alone, and only Fusarium solani f.sp. pisi was inhibited by beta-1,3-glucanase alone. However, combinations of purified chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase inhibited all fungi tested as effectively as crude protein extracts containing the same enzyme activities. The pea pathogen, Fusarium solani f.sp. pisi, and the nonpathogen of peas, Fusarium solani f.sp. phaseoli, were similarly strongly inhibited by chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase, indicating that the differential pathogenicity of the two fungi is not due to differential sensitivity to the pea enzymes. Inhibition of fungal growth was caused by the lysis of the hyphal tips.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2011) · Cited by 918
Multiple effects of chitosan on plant systems: Solid science or hype
Hadwiger, L. A. (2013) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.03.007 · Cited by 358
Chitinases: in agriculture and human healthcare
Nagpure, A., Choudhary, B., & Gupta, R. K. (2014) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.3109/07388551.2013.790874 · Cited by 145
Xue, L., Xue, Q., Chen, Q., Lin, C., Shen, G., & Zhao, J. (2013) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2012.10.002 · Cited by 116
Shih, I.-L., Kuo, C.-Y., Hsieh, F.-C., Kao, S.-S., & Hsieh, C. (2008) · Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.jcice.2008.05.005 · Cited by 48
Šimkovicová, M., Kramer, G., Rep, M., & Takken, F. L. W. (2024) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1384431 · Cited by 29
(2010) · Plant Omics · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Mauch, F., Mauch-Mani, B., & Boller, T.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988-11-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 936-942
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2026444478
- Cited by
- 1,186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.