The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aluminum Partitioning in Intact Roots of Aluminum-Tolerant and Aluminum-Sensitive Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars
Open accessAbstract
Aluminum (Al) partitioning in intact roots of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars that differ in sensitivity to Al was investigated. Roots of intact seedlings were exposed to Al for up to 24 hours and distribution of Al was assessed visually by hematoxylin staining or by direct measurement of concentration of Al by atomic absorption spectrophotometry or ion chromatography. Major differences in Al accumulation between Al-tolerant (Atlas 66) and Al-sensitive (Tam 105) cultivars were found in the growing regions 0 to 2 and 2 to 5 millimeters from the root apex. Al content was 9 to 13 times greater in the 0 to 2 millimeters root tips of cv Tam 105 than in the tips of cv Atlas 66 when exposed to 50 micromolar Al for 19 to 24 hours. The oxidative phosphorylation inhibitor carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone and the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide increased Al uptake by intact root tips of cv Atlas 66. Also, loss of Al from the roots of both cultivars was measured after the roots were "pulsed" with 50 micromolar Al for 2 hours and then placed in an Al-free nutrient solution for 6 hours. The 0 to 2 millimeter root tips of cv Tam 105 lost 30% of the absorbed Al, whereas the tips of cv Atlas 66 lost 60%. In light of these results, we conclude that the differential Al sensitivity in wheat correlates with the concentration of Al in the root meristems. The data support the hypothesis that part of the mechanism for Al tolerance in wheat is based on a metabolism-dependent exclusion of Al from the sensitive meristems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The physiology of metal toxicity in plants
Foy, C. D., Chaney, R. L., & White, M. C. (1978) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.29.060178.002455 · Cited by 2,170
Cited by
Aluminium Toxicity in Roots: An Investigation of Spatial Sensitivity and the Role of the Root Cap
RYAN, P. R., DITOMASO, J. M., & KOCHIAN, L. V. (1993) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/44.2.437 · Cited by 593
Aluminium toxicity in plants: a review
Rout, G. R., Samantaray, S., & Das, P. (2001) · Agronomie · doi:10.1051/agro:2001105 · Cited by 420
The role of the apoplast in aluminium toxicity and resistance of higher plants: A review
Horst, W. J. (1995) · Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde · doi:10.1002/jpln.19951580503 · Cited by 342
Yang, J. L. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eri113 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Rincón, M., & Gonzales, R. A.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-07-01
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1021-1028
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1988297220
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aluminum Partitioning in Intact Roots of Aluminum-Tolerant and Aluminum-Sensitive Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.99.3.1021
- The paper
- Rincón, M., & Gonzales, R. A. (1992). Aluminum Partitioning in Intact Roots of Aluminum-Tolerant and Aluminum-Sensitive Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.99.3.1021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.