The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Repression Domains of Class II ERF Transcriptional Repressors Share an Essential Motif for Active Repression
Open accessAbstract
We reported previously that three ERF transcription factors, tobacco ERF3 (NtERF3) and Arabidopsis AtERF3 and AtERF4, which are categorized as class II ERFs, are active repressors of transcription. To clarify the roles of these repressors in transcriptional regulation in plants, we attempted to identify the functional domains of the ERF repressor that mediates the repression of transcription. Analysis of the results of a series of deletions revealed that the C-terminal 35 amino acids of NtERF3 are sufficient to confer the capacity for repression of transcription on a heterologous DNA binding domain. This repression domain suppressed the intermolecular activities of other transcriptional activators. In addition, fusion of this repression domain to the VP16 activation domain completely inhibited the transactivation function of VP16. Comparison of amino acid sequences of class II ERF repressors revealed the conservation of the sequence motif (L)/(F)DLN(L)/(F)(x)P. This motif was essential for repression because mutations within the motif eliminated the capacity for repression. We designated this motif the ERF-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motif, and we identified this motif in a number of zinc-finger proteins from wheat, Arabidopsis, and petunia plants. These zinc finger proteins functioned as repressors, and their repression domains were identified as regions that contained an EAR motif.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Liu, Q., Kasuga, M., Sakuma, Y., Abe, H., Miura, S., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (1998) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.10.8.1391 · Cited by 3,044
Stockinger, E. J., Gilmour, S. J., & Thomashow, M. F. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.3.1035 · Cited by 1,807
Williamson, E. A., Xu, H. N., Gombart, A. F., Verbeek, W., Chumakov, A. M., Friedman, A. D., & Koeffler, H. P. (1998) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.273.24.14796 · Cited by 50
Cited by
Systemic Acquired Resistance: Turning Local Infection into Global Defense
Fu, Z. Q., & Dong, X. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105606 · Cited by 1,524
AP2/ERF family transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses
Mizoi, J., Shinozaki, K., & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2012) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms · doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.08.004 · Cited by 1,448
Transcription factors in plant defense and stress responses
Singh, K. (2002) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00289-3 · Cited by 1,381
Licausi, F., Ohme‐Takagi, M., & Perata, P. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12291 · Cited by 1,020
Self-citationTOPLESS Mediates Auxin-Dependent Transcriptional Repression During Arabidopsis Embryogenesis
Szemenyei, H., Hannon, M., & Long, J. A. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151461 · Cited by 801
Metadata
- Authors
- Ohta, M., Matsui, K., Hiratsu, K., Shinshi, H., & Ohme-Takagi, M.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1959-1968
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2155121212
- Cited by
- 845
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repression Domains of Class II ERF Transcriptional Repressors Share an Essential Motif for Active Repression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.010127
- The paper
- Ohta, M., Matsui, K., Hiratsu, K., Shinshi, H., & Ohme-Takagi, M. (2001). Repression Domains of Class II ERF Transcriptional Repressors Share an Essential Motif for Active Repression. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.010127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.