The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reevaluation of the Effects of Brefeldin A on Plant Cells Using Tobacco Bright Yellow 2 Cells Expressing Golgi-Targeted Green Fluorescent Protein and COPI Antisera
Open accessAbstract
Brefeldin A (BFA) causes a block in the secretory system of eukaryotic cells by inhibiting vesicle formation at the Golgi apparatus. Although this toxin has been used in many studies, its effects on plant cells are still shrouded in controversy. We have reinvestigated the early responses of plant cells to BFA with novel tools, namely, tobacco Bright Yellow 2 (BY-2) suspension-cultured cells expressing an in vivo green fluorescent protein-Golgi marker, electron microscopy of high-pressure frozen/freeze-substituted cells, and antisera against Atgamma-COP, a component of COPI coats, and AtArf1, the GTPase necessary for COPI coat assembly. The first effect of 10 microg/mL BFA on BY-2 cells was to induce in <5 min the complete loss of vesicle-forming Atgamma-COP from Golgi cisternae. During the subsequent 15 to 20 min, this block in Golgi-based vesicle formation led to a series of sequential changes in Golgi architecture, the loss of distinct Golgi stacks, and the formation of an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-Golgi hybrid compartment with stacked domains. These secondary effects appear to depend in part on stabilizing intercisternal filaments and include the continued maturation of cis- and medial cisternae into trans-Golgi cisternae, as predicted by the cisternal progression model, the shedding of trans-Golgi network cisternae, the fusion of individual Golgi cisternae with the ER, and the formation of large ER-Golgi hybrid stacks. Prolonged exposure of the BY-2 cells to BFA led to the transformation of the ER-Golgi hybrid compartment into a sponge-like structure that does not resemble normal ER. Thus, although the initial effects of BFA on plant cells are the same as those described for mammalian cells, the secondary and tertiary effects have drastically different morphological manifestations. These results indicate that, despite a number of similarities in the trafficking machinery with other eukaryotes, there are fundamental differences in the functional architecture and properties of the plant Golgi apparatus that are the cause for the unique responses of the plant secretory pathway to BFA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Helms, J. B., & Rothman, J. E. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/360352a0 · Cited by 746
Chardin, P., & McCormick, F. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80724-2 · Cited by 407
Cited by
Nelson, B. K., Cai, X., & Nebenführ, A. (2007) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03212.x · Cited by 2,083
Self-citationGeldner, N., Anders, N., Wolters, H., Keicher, J., Kornberger, W., Muller, P., Delbarre, A., Ueda, T., Nakano, A., & Jürgens, G. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00003-5 · Cited by 1,122
Gunatilaka, A. A. L. (2006) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np058128n · Cited by 1,032
Uemura, T., Ueda, T., Ohniwa, R. L., Nakano, A., Takeyasu, K., & Sato, M. H. (2004) · Cell Structure and Function · doi:10.1247/csf.29.49 · Cited by 532
Organization of the ER–Golgi interface for membrane traffic control
Brandizzi, F., & Barlowe, C. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3588 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Ritzenthaler, C., Nebenführ, A., Movafeghi, A., Stussi-Garaud, C., Behnia, L., Pimpl, P., Staehelin, L. A., & Robinson, D. G.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 237-261
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2139646081
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.