The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Arabidopsis Epithiospecifier Protein Promotes the Hydrolysis of Glucosinolates to Nitriles and Influences Trichoplusia ni Herbivory
Open accessAbstract
Glucosinolates are anionic thioglucosides that have become one of the most frequently studied groups of defensive metabolites in plants. When tissue damage occurs, the thioglucoside linkage is hydrolyzed by enzymes known as myrosinases, resulting in the formation of a variety of products that are active against herbivores and pathogens. In an effort to learn more about the molecular genetic and biochemical regulation of glucosinolate hydrolysis product formation, we analyzed leaf samples of 122 Arabidopsis ecotypes. A distinct polymorphism was observed with all ecotypes producing primarily isothiocyanates or primarily nitriles. The ecotypes Columbia (Col) and Landsberg erecta (Ler) differed in their hydrolysis products; therefore, the Col x Ler recombinant inbred lines were used for mapping the genes controlling this polymorphism. The major quantitative trait locus (QTL) affecting nitrile versus isothiocyanate formation was found very close to a gene encoding a homolog of a Brassica napus epithiospecifier protein (ESP), which causes the formation of epithionitriles instead of isothiocyanates during glucosinolate hydrolysis in the seeds of certain Brassicaceae. The heterologously expressed Arabidopsis ESP was able to convert glucosinolates both to epithionitriles and to simple nitriles in the presence of myrosinase, and thus it was more versatile than previously described ESPs. The role of ESP in plant defense is uncertain, because the generalist herbivore Trichoplusia ni (the cabbage looper) was found to feed more readily on nitrile-producing than on isothiocyanate-producing Arabidopsis. However, isothiocyanates are frequently used as recognition cues by specialist herbivores, and so the formation of nitriles instead of isothiocyanates may allow Arabidopsis to be less apparent to specialists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Glucosinolate Metabolites Required for an Arabidopsis Innate Immune Response
Clay, N. K., Adio, A. M., Denoux, C., Jander, G., & Ausubel, F. M. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1164627 · Cited by 1,098
Glucosinolate metabolism and its control
Grubb, C. D., & Abel, S. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2005.12.006 · Cited by 733
The enzymic and chemically induced decomposition of glucosinolates
BONES, A., & ROSSITER, J. (2006) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.02.024 · Cited by 587
β-Glucosidases as detonators of plant chemical defense
Morant, A. V., Jørgensen, K., Jørgensen, C., Paquette, S. M., Sánchez-Pérez, R., Møller, B. L., & Bak, S. (2008) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.03.006 · Cited by 549
Explaining intraspecific diversity in plant secondary metabolites in an ecological context
Moore, B. D., Andrew, R. L., Külheim, C., & Foley, W. J. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12526 · Cited by 533
Metadata
- Authors
- Lambrix, V., Reichelt, M., Mitchell-Olds, T., Kliebenstein, D. J., & Gershenzon, J.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2793-2807
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2106515175
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Arabidopsis Epithiospecifier Protein Promotes the Hydrolysis of Glucosinolates to Nitriles and Influences Trichoplusia ni Herbivory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.010261
- The paper
- Lambrix, V., Reichelt, M., Mitchell-Olds, T., Kliebenstein, D. J., & Gershenzon, J. (2001). The Arabidopsis Epithiospecifier Protein Promotes the Hydrolysis of Glucosinolates to Nitriles and Influences Trichoplusia ni Herbivory. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.010261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.