The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Tomato Suppressor of prosystemin-mediated responses2 Gene Encodes a Fatty Acid Desaturase Required for the Biosynthesis of Jasmonic Acid and the Production of a Systemic Wound Signal for Defense Gene Expression
Open accessAbstract
Genetic analysis of the wound response pathway in tomato indicates that systemin and its precursor protein, prosystemin, are upstream components of a defensive signaling cascade that involves the synthesis and subsequent action of the octadecatrienoic acid (18:3)-derived plant hormone jasmonic acid (JA). The suppressor of prosystemin-mediated responses2 (spr2) mutation, which was isolated previously as a suppressor of (pro)systemin-mediated signaling, impairs wound-induced JA biosynthesis and the production of a long-distance signal for the expression of defensive Proteinase inhibitor genes. Using a map-based cloning approach, we demonstrate here that Spr2 encodes a chloroplast fatty acid desaturase involved in JA biosynthesis. Loss of Spr2 function reduced the 18:3 content of leaves to <10% of wild-type levels, abolished the accumulation of hexadecatrienoic acid, and caused a corresponding increase in the level of dienoic fatty acids. The effect of spr2 on the fatty acyl content of various classes of glycerolipids indicated that the Spr2 gene product catalyzes most, if not all, omega3 fatty acid desaturation within the "prokaryotic pathway" for lipid synthesis in tomato leaves. Despite the reduced levels of trienoic fatty acids, spr2 plants exhibited normal growth, development, and reproduction. However, the mutant was compromised in defense against attack by tobacco hornworm larvae. These results indicate that jasmonate synthesis from chloroplast pools of 18:3 is required for wound- and systemin-induced defense responses and support a role for systemin in the production of a transmissible signal that is derived from the octadecanoid pathway.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant resistance towards insect herbivores: a dynamic interaction
Gatehouse, J. A. (2002) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00519.x · Cited by 704
Cited by
Li, L., Zhao, Y., McCaig, B. C., Wingerd, B. A., Wang, J., Whalon, M. E., Pichersky, E., & Howe, G. A. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.017954 · Cited by 673
Self-citationSignal Crosstalk and Induced Resistance: Straddling the Line Between Cost and Benefit
Bostock, R. M. (2005) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095505 · Cited by 615
Mengiste, T. (2012) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-172955 · Cited by 566
Du, M., Zhao, J., Tzeng, D. T. W., Liu, Y., Deng, L., Yang, T., Zhai, Q., Wu, F., Huang, Z., Zhou, M., et al. (2017) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.16.00953 · Cited by 420
Self-citationRegulation of Carotenoid Metabolism in Tomato
Liu, L., Shao, Z., Zhang, M., & Wang, Q. (2015) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2014.11.006 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, C., Liu, G., Xu, C., Lee, G. I., Bauer, P., Ling, H.-Q., Ganal, M. W., & Howe, G. A.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-05-29
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1646-1661
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2162327789
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.