The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Signal Crosstalk and Induced Resistance: Straddling the Line Between Cost and Benefit
Abstract
This review discusses recent progress in our understanding of signaling in induced plant resistance and susceptibility to pathogens and insect herbivores, with a focus on the connections and crosstalk among phytohormone signaling networks that regulate responses to these and other stresses. Multiple stresses, often simultaneous, reduce growth and yield in plants. However, prior challenge by a pathogen or insect herbivore also can induce resistance to subsequent challenge. This resistance, or failure of susceptibility, must be orchestrated within a larger physiological context that is strongly influenced by other biotic agents and by abiotic stresses such as inadequate light, temperature extremes, drought, nutrient limitation, and soil salinity. Continued research in this area is predicated on the notion that effective utilization of induced resistance in crop protection will require a functional understanding of the physiological consequences of the “induced” state of the plant, coupled with the knowledge of the specificity and compatibility of the signaling systems leading to this state. This information may guide related strategies to improve crop performance in suboptimal environments, and define the limits of induced resistance in certain agricultural contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction
Apel, K., & Hirt, H. (2004) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701 · Cited by 11,723
Bacterial Volatiles Induce Systemic Resistance in Arabidopsis
Ryu, C.-M., Farag, M. A., Hu, C.-H., Reddy, M. S., Kloepper, J. W., & Paré, P. W. (2004) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.103.026583 · Cited by 1,308
Cited by
Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease
Vlot, A. C., Dempsey, D. A., & Klessig, D. F. (2009) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.050908.135202 · Cited by 2,568
Mechanisms of nematode suppression by organic soil amendments—A review
Oka, Y. (2010) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.11.003 · Cited by 608
Jasmonate-induced defenses: a tale of intelligence, collaborators and rascals
Ballaré, C. L. (2011) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2010.12.001 · Cited by 295
Arif, Y., Sami, F., Siddiqui, H., Bajguz, A., & Hayat, S. (2020) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104040 · Cited by 257
De Vleesschauwer, D., Chernin, L., & Höfte, M. M. (2009) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-9-9 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Bostock, R. M.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Phytopathology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2005-09-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 545-580
- ISSN
- 0066-4286 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2107
- OpenAlex
- W2169562034
- Cited by
- 615
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Signal Crosstalk and Induced Resistance: Straddling the Line Between Cost and Benefit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095505
- The paper
- Bostock, R. M. (2005). Signal Crosstalk and Induced Resistance: Straddling the Line Between Cost and Benefit. Annual Review of Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095505
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.