The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The F-Box Protein ZEITLUPE Confers Dosage-Dependent Control on the Circadian Clock, Photomorphogenesis, and Flowering Time[W]
Open accessAbstract
As an F-box protein, ZEITLUPE (ZTL) is involved in targeting one or more substrates for ubiquitination and degradation via the proteasome. The initial characterization of ZTL suggested a function limited largely to the regulation of the circadian clock. Here, we show a considerably broader role for ZTL in the control of circadian period and photomorphogenesis. Using a ZTL-specific antibody, we quantitated and characterized a ZTL dosage series that ranges from a null mutation to a strong ZTL overexpressor. In the dark,ztl null mutations lengthen circadian period, and overexpression causes arrhythmicity, suggesting a more comprehensive role for this protein in the clock than previously suspected. In the light, circadian period becomes increasingly shorter at higher levels of ZTL, to the point of arrhythmicity. By contrast, hypocotyl length increases and flowering time is delayed in direct proportion to the level of ZTL. We propose a novel testable mechanism by which circadian period and amplitude may act together to gate phytochrome B–mediated suppression of hypocotyl. We also demonstrate that ZTL-dependent delay of flowering is mediated through decreases in CONSTANS and FLOWERING LOCUS T message levels, thus directly linking proteasome-dependent proteolysis to flowering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phototropins 1 and 2: versatile plant blue-light receptors
Briggs, W. R., & Christie, J. M. (2002) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02245-8 · Cited by 785 · cited 2×
“Both of these proteins are dedicated (Arabidopsis) or generic (Neurospora) blue light photoreceptors, and the LOV domains are the primary photosensing regions (Briggs and Christie, 2002; Froehlich et al., 2002; He et al., 2002).”
Background
Cited by
The Circadian System in Higher Plants
Harmer, S. L. (2009) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092054 · Cited by 719
The Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway and Plant Development
Moon, J., Parry, G., & Estelle, M. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.104.161220 · Cited by 586
Phytochrome Signaling Mechanisms
Li, J., Li, G., Wang, H., & Wang Deng, X. (2011) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0148 · Cited by 561
Phytochrome Interacting Factors: central players in phytochrome-mediated light signaling networks
Castillon, A., Shen, H., & Huq, E. (2007) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2007.10.001 · Cited by 470
LUX ARRHYTHMO encodes a Myb domain protein essential for circadian rhythms
Hazen, S. P., Schultz, T. F., Pruneda-Paz, J. L., Borevitz, J. O., Ecker, J. R., & Kay, S. A. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0503029102 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Somers, D. E., Kim, W.-Y., & Geng, R.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-03-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 769-782
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2106807470
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.