The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Activation of the Tobacco SIP Kinase by Both a Cell Wall–Derived Carbohydrate Elicitor and Purified Proteinaceous Elicitins from Phytophthora spp
Open accessAbstract
Two purified proteinaceous fungal elicitors, parasiticein (an alpha elicitin) and cryptogein (a beta elicitin), as well as a fungal cell wall-derived carbohydrate elicitor all rapidly activated a 48-kD kinase in tobacco suspension cells. The maximum activation of this kinase paralleled or preceded medium alkalization and activation of the defense gene phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL). In addition, the two elicitins, which also induced hypersensitive cell death, activated a 44- and a 40-kD kinase with delayed kinetics. By contrast, the cell wall-derived elicitor only weakly activated the 44-kD kinase and failed to activate the 40-kD kinase. The size and substrate preference of the 48-kD kinase are reminiscent of the recently purified and cloned salicylic acid-induced protein (SIP) kinase, which is a member of the mitogen-activated protein kinase family. Antibodies raised against a peptide corresponding to the unique N terminus of SIP kinase immunoreacted with the 48-kD kinase activated by all three elicitors from Phytophthora spp. In addition, the cell wall elicitor and the salicylic acid-activated 48-kD kinase copurified through several chromatography steps and comigrated on two-dimensional gels. Based on these results, all three fungal elicitors appear to activate the SIP kinase. In addition, inhibition of SIP kinase activation by kinase inhibitors correlated with the suppression of cell wall elicitor-induced medium alkalization and PAL gene activation, suggesting a regulatory function for the SIP kinase in these defense responses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity
Asai, T., Tena, G., Plotnikova, J., Willmann, M. R., Chiu, W.-L., Gomez-Gomez, L., Boller, T., Ausubel, F. M., & Sheen, J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415977a · Cited by 2,726
Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences
Nürnberger, T., Brunner, F., Kemmerling, B., & Piater, L. (2004) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0119.x · Cited by 1,286
MAPK cascades in plant defense signaling
Zhang, S., & Klessig, D. F. (2001) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(01)02103-3 · Cited by 773
Self-citationEarly Signaling Events Induced by Elicitors of Plant Defenses
Garcia-Brugger, A., Lamotte, O., Vandelle, E., Bourque, S., Lecourieux, D., Poinssot, B., Wendehenne, D., & Pugin, A. (2006) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi-19-0711 · Cited by 630
Mitogen‐activated protein kinase cascades in plant signaling
Zhang, M., & Zhang, S. (2022) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.13215 · Cited by 599
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, S., Du, H., & Klessig, D. F.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 435-449
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2129860418
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 45.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activation of the Tobacco SIP Kinase by Both a Cell Wall–Derived Carbohydrate Elicitor and Purified Proteinaceous Elicitins from Phytophthora spp. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.10.3.435
- The paper
- Zhang, S., Du, H., & Klessig, D. F. (1998). Activation of the Tobacco SIP Kinase by Both a Cell Wall–Derived Carbohydrate Elicitor and Purified Proteinaceous Elicitins from Phytophthora spp. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.10.3.435
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.