The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NDR1 Interaction with RIN4 Mediates the Differential Activation of Multiple Disease Resistance Pathways in Arabidopsis
Open accessAbstract
Recognition of pathogens by plants involves the coordinated efforts of molecular chaperones, disease resistance (R) proteins, and components of disease resistance signaling pathways. Characterization of events associated with pathogen perception in Arabidopsis thaliana has advanced understanding of molecular genetic mechanisms associated with disease resistance and protein interactions critical for the activation of resistance signaling. Regulation of R protein-mediated signaling in response to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis involves the physical association of at least two R proteins with the negative regulator RPM1 INTERACTING PROTEIN4 (RIN4). While the RIN4-RPS2 (for RESISTANCE TO P. SYRINGAE2) and RIN4-RPM1 (for RESISTANCE TO P. SYRINGAE PV MACULICOLA1) signaling pathways exhibit differential mechanisms of activation in terms of effector action, the requirement for NON-RACE-SPECIFIC DISEASE RESISTANCE1 (NDR1) is shared. Using a yeast two-hybrid screen, followed by a series of coimmunoprecipitation experiments, we demonstrate that the RIN4-NDR1 interaction occurs on the cytoplasmically localized N-terminal portion of NDR1 and that this interaction is required for the activation of resistance signaling following infection by P. syringae expressing the Cys protease Type III effector protein AvrRpt2. We demonstrate that like RPS2 and RPM1, NDR1 also associates with RIN4 in planta. We suggest that this interaction serves to further regulate activation of disease resistance signaling following recognition of P. syringae DC3000-AvrRpt2 by Arabidopsis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Host-Microbe Interactions: Shaping the Evolution of the Plant Immune Response
Chisholm, S. T., Coaker, G., Day, B., & Staskawicz, B. J. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.008 · Cited by 2,957
Self-citation
Cited by
Jones, J. D. G., & Dangl, J. L. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05286 · Cited by 13,177
Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant–pathogen interactions
Dodds, P. N., & Rathjen, J. P. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2812 · Cited by 3,424
Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease
Vlot, A. C., Dempsey, D. A., & Klessig, D. F. (2009) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.050908.135202 · Cited by 2,568
Effector-Triggered Immunity: From Pathogen Perception to Robust Defense
Cui, H., Tsuda, K., & Parker, J. E. (2015) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040012 · Cited by 1,428
Disease Resistance Mechanisms in Plants
Andersen, E. J., Ali, S., Byamukama, E., Yen, Y., & Nepal, M. P. (2018) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes9070339 · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Day, B., Dahlbeck, D., & Staskawicz, B. J.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-09-29
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2782-2791
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2157727146
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.