The DOI matches its Crossref record.
T-DNA as an Insertional Mutagen in Arabidopsis
Open accessAbstract
Forward genetics begins with a mutant phenotype and asks the question “What is the genotype?” that is, what is the sequence of the mutant gene causing the altered phenotype? Reverse genetics begins with a mutant gene sequence and asks the question “What is the resulting change in phenotype?” These two approaches are fundamentally different, and whereas forward genetics has been in operation for more than a century, the recent avalanche of complete genome sequences has only now created the opportunity for pursuing reverse genetics in an exhaustive and complete manner. Gene knockouts, or null mutations, are important because they provide a direct route to determining the function of a gene product in situ. Most other approaches to gene function are correlative and do not necessarily prove a causal relationship between gene sequence and function. For example, DNA chips provide an exciting means to discover conditions under which gene expression is regulated on a genomewide scale (DeRisi et al., 1997; Wodicka et al., 1997; Singh-Gasson et al., 1999). However, because factors other than mRNA level alone determine the activity of a gene product in situ, expression studies, even when done on a genomewide scale, cannot prove a causal relationship. By contrast, the availability of a null mutation for the gene of interest allows one to directly monitor the effect this deficiency has on the organism’s ability to function. There are many ways to implement targeted mutagenesis so as to compromise specific genes. In mice, knockout mutations are now routinely obtained by promoting the homologous recombination of null gene constructs with the genomic wild-type sequence in embryonic stem cells. Provided that the given mutation is not embryonic lethal, “knockout mice” can then be developed in utero by injecting such stem cells into blastocysts (Koller et al., 1989). Yeast and Escherichia coli are other organisms in which homologous recombination is the preferred means for reverse genetics. Although there has been a report of homologous recombination with intact Arabidopsis plants (Kempin et al., 1997), the frequency of this event may be so low as to preclude its use for generating knockout mutations in each of the ∼25,000 genes that comprise the 120-Mb genome. Insertional mutagenesis is an alternative means of disrupting gene function and is based on the insertion of foreign DNA into the gene of interest. In Arabidopsis, this involves the use of either transposable elements (see Parinov et al., 1999, in this issue) or T-DNA. The foreign DNA not only disrupts the expression of the gene into which it is inserted but also acts as a marker for subsequent identification of the mutation. Because Arabidopsis introns are small, and because there is very little intergenic material, the insertion of a piece of T-DNA on the order of 5 to 25 kb in length generally produces a dramatic disruption of gene function. If a large enough population of T-DNA–transformed lines is available, one has a very good chance of finding a plant carrying a T-DNA insert within any gene of interest. Mutations that are homozygous lethal can be maintained in the population in the form of heterozygous plants. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods have been developed that allow one to easily isolate individual plants that carry a particular T-DNA mutation of interest (McKinney et al., 1995; Krysan et al., 1996). An advantage of using T-DNAs as the insertional mutagen, as opposed to transposons (Martienssen, 1998; Wisman et al., 1998), is that T-DNA insertions will not transpose subsequent to integration within the genome and are therefore chemically and physically stable through multiple generations. The mobility of transposons is not necessarily a bad thing, however. In situations in which multiple members of a gene family are arranged in tandem along a chromosome, the ability of transposons to “hop” to nearby locations provides a convenient method for creating mutations within all of the members of the gene family within a single plant. Several improvements in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation techniques have made T-DNA a viable method for approaching genomewide mutagenesis. The original root-explant method (Valvekens et al., 1988) allowed one to isolate many hundreds and possibly thousands of intact transformed plants, albeit via a laborious tissue culture process. Tens of thousands of transformed plants were beyond reach, however, until Feldmann and Marks (1987) elaborated a method for producing independent T-DNA transgenic lines via seed transformation. The development of transformation methods based on dipping whole plants into Agrobacterium suspensions has more recently allowed, in theory, for the production of the hundreds of thousands of insertional mutations necessary for saturation of the genome (Bechtold and Pelletier, 1998; Clough and Bent, 1998). Saturation of the Arabidopsis genome with T-DNA insertions is an experimental goal that requires
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
P HYTOCHELATINS AND M ETALLOTHIONEINS : Roles in Heavy Metal Detoxification and Homeostasis
Cobbett, C., & Goldsbrough, P. (2002) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135154 · Cited by 2,518
A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants
Xing, H.-L., Dong, L., Wang, Z.-P., Zhang, H.-Y., Han, C.-Y., Liu, B., Wang, X.-C., & Chen, Q.-J. (2014) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-014-0327-y · Cited by 1,684
Agrobacterium -Mediated Plant Transformation: the Biology behind the “Gene-Jockeying” Tool
Gelvin, S. B. (2003) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.67.1.16-37.2003 · Cited by 1,379
Radial Patterning of Arabidopsis Shoots by Class III HD-ZIP and KANADI Genes
Emery, J. F., Floyd, S. K., Alvarez, J., Eshed, Y., Hawker, N. P., Izhaki, A., Baum, S. F., & Bowman, J. L. (2003) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2003.09.035 · Cited by 1,143
Yoshimoto, K., Hanaoka, H., Sato, S., Kato, T., Tabata, S., Noda, T., & Ohsumi, Y. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.104.025395 · Cited by 603
Metadata
- Authors
- Krysan, P. J., Young, J. C., & Sussman, M. R.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2283-2290
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2148663332
- Cited by
- 731
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 64.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: T-DNA as an Insertional Mutagen in Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.11.12.2283
- The paper
- Krysan, P. J., Young, J. C., & Sussman, M. R. (1999). T-DNA as an Insertional Mutagen in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.11.12.2283
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.