Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Megabase Level Sequencing Reveals Contrasted Organization and Evolution Patterns of the Wheat Gene and Transposable Element Spaces

Open access
Choulet, Frédéric, Wicker, Thomas, Rustenholz, Camille, Paux, Etienne, Salse, Jérome, Leroy, Philippe, Schlub, Stéphane, Le Paslier, Marie-Christine, Magdelenat, Ghislaine, Gonthier, Catherine, Couloux, Arnaud, Budak, Hikmet, Breen, James, Pumphrey, Michael, Liu, Sixin, Kong, Xiuying, Jia, Jizeng, Gut, Marta, Brunel, Dominique, Anderson, James A., Gill, Bikram S., Appels, Rudi, Keller, Beat, Feuillet, Catherine·2010·The Plant Cell

Abstract

To improve our understanding of the organization and evolution of the wheat (Triticum aestivum) genome, we sequenced and annotated 13-Mb contigs (18.2 Mb) originating from different regions of its largest chromosome, 3B (1 Gb), and produced a 2x chromosome survey by shotgun Illumina/Solexa sequencing. All regions carried genes irrespective of their chromosomal location. However, gene distribution was not random, with 75% of them clustered into small islands containing three genes on average. A twofold increase of gene density was observed toward the telomeres likely due to high tandem and interchromosomal duplication events. A total of 3222 transposable elements were identified, including 800 new families. Most of them are complete but showed a highly nested structure spread over distances as large as 200 kb. A succession of amplification waves involving different transposable element families led to contrasted sequence compositions between the proximal and distal regions. Finally, with an estimate of 50,000 genes per diploid genome, our data suggest that wheat may have a higher gene number than other cereals. Indeed, comparisons with rice (Oryza sativa) and Brachypodium revealed that a high number of additional noncollinear genes are interspersed within a highly conserved ancestral grass gene backbone, supporting the idea of an accelerated evolution in the Triticeae lineages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1105/tpc.110.074187

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Choulet, F., Wicker, T., Rustenholz, C., Paux, E., Salse, J., Leroy, P., Schlub, S., Le Paslier, M.-C., Magdelenat, G., Gonthier, C., Couloux, A., Budak, H., Breen, J., Pumphrey, M., Liu, S., Kong, X., Jia, J., Gut, M., Brunel, D., Anderson, J. A., Gill, B. S., Appels, R., Keller, B., & Feuillet, C.
Venue
The Plant Cell
Published
2010-06-01
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
1686-1701
ISSN
  • 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-298X
OpenAlex
W2101875628
Cited by
264
References
68
FWCI
42.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Megabase Level Sequencing Reveals Contrasted Organization and Evolution Patterns of the Wheat Gene and Transposable Element Spaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.110.074187
The paper
Choulet, F., Wicker, T., Rustenholz, C., Paux, E., Salse, J., Leroy, P., Schlub, S., Le Paslier, M.-C., Magdelenat, G., Gonthier, C., Couloux, A., Budak, H., Breen, J., Pumphrey, M., Liu, S., Kong, X., Jia, J., Gut, M., Brunel, D., . . . Feuillet, C. (2010). Megabase Level Sequencing Reveals Contrasted Organization and Evolution Patterns of the Wheat Gene and Transposable Element Spaces. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.074187

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.