Cytokinin Regulates Compound Leaf Development in Tomato
Open accessAbstract
Leaf shape diversity relies on transient morphogenetic activity in leaf margins. However, how this morphogenetic capacity is maintained is still poorly understood. Here, we uncover a role for the hormone cytokinin (CK) in the regulation of morphogenetic activity of compound leaves in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Manipulation of CK levels led to alterations in leaf complexity and revealed a unique potential for prolonged growth and morphogenesis in tomato leaves. We further demonstrate that the effect of CK on leaf complexity depends on proper localization of auxin signaling. Genetic analysis showed that reduction of CK levels suppresses the effect of Knotted1 like homeobox (KNOXI) proteins on leaf shape and that CK can substitute for KNOXI activity at the leaf margin, suggesting that CK mediates the activity of KNOXI proteins in the regulation of leaf shape. These results imply that CK regulates flexible leaf patterning by dynamic interaction with additional hormones and transcription factors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tomato DR5:VENUS signal was strong in incipient leaf primordia (P0), indicating a strong auxin response in this region.
“Tomato plants harboring a DR5:VENUS construct (Shani et al., 2010) revealed a strong DR5:VENUS signal in incipient leaf primordia (P0) (Figure 5A), indicating a strong auxin response in this region.”
From Auxin Depletion from the Leaf Axil Conditions Competence for Axillary Meristem Formation in <i>Arabidopsis</i> and Tomato (2014) · cites this paper as Shani et al., 2010
High CK concentrations promote leaflet formation, while low CK concentrations restrict it.
“These data suggest that high CK concentrations promote leaflet formation, while low CK concentrations restrict it.”
From <i>Divide et impera</i>: boundaries shape the plant body and initiate new meristems (2016) · cites this paper as Shani et al., 2010
Manipulation of CK concentrations does not interfere with auxin distribution in transgenic tomato plants.
“In these transgenic plants, auxin response patterns, as indicated by the DR5::VENUS and PIN1::PIN1-GFP reporters, remained unchanged, suggesting that manipulation of CK concentrations does not interfere with auxin distribution (Shani et al., 2010).”
From <i>Divide et impera</i>: boundaries shape the plant body and initiate new meristems (2016) · cites this paper as Shani et al., 2010
Cites
The NAC-domain transcription factor GOBLET specifies leaflet boundaries in compound tomato leaves
Berger, Y., Harpaz-Saad, S., Brand, A., Melnik, H., Sirding, N., Alvarez, J. P., Zinder, M., Samach, A., Eshed, Y., & Ori, N. (2009) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.031625 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Self-citationOrganogenetic capacity of leaves: The significance of marginal blastozones in angiosperms
Hagemann, W., & Gleissberg, S. (1996) · Plant Systematics and Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00984901 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Gene expression patterns in seed plant shoot meristems and leaves: homoplasy or homology?
Floyd, S. K., & Bowman, J. L. (2010) · Journal of Plant Research · doi:10.1007/s10265-009-0256-2 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, Q., Kohlen, W., Rossmann, S., Vernoux, T., & Theres, K. (2014) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.114.123059 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
<i>Divide et impera</i>: boundaries shape the plant body and initiate new meristems
Wang, Q., Hasson, A., Rossmann, S., & Theres, K. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13641 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shani, E., Ben-Gera, H., Shleizer-Burko, S., Burko, Y., Weiss, D., & Ori, N.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- The Robert H. Smith Institute of Plant Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture and The Otto Warburg Minerva Center for Agricultural Biotechnology, Hebrew University, Rehovot 76100, Israel
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-10-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3206-3217
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- PMC
- PMC2990126
- OpenAlex
- W2143684085
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 19.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- The Plant Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Keywords
- cytokinins, compound leaf development, tomato, leaf shape, auxin signaling, leaf patterning, plant hormone interaction
- MeSH terms
- Cytokinins, Indoleacetic Acids, Plant Proteins, Homeodomain Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Plant Leaves, Solanum lycopersicum, RNA, Plant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review