Cited by 205Plant Molecular Biology ResearchBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesPlant Diversity and Evolution

Organogenetic capacity of leaves: The significance of marginal blastozones in angiosperms

Hagemann, Wolfgang, Gleissberg, Stefan·1996·Plant Systematics and Evolution

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00984901

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hagemann, W., & Gleissberg, S.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
Plant Systematics and Evolution
Published
1996
Volume
199
Issue
3-4
Pages
121-152
ISSN
  • 0029-8948 (ISSN-L)
  • 0378-2697
  • 1615-6110
OpenAlex
W2056470759
Cited by
205
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Plant Systematics and Evolution (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
Keywords
organogenesis, morphogenesis, histogenesis, organ initiation, angiosperm leaves, cell division rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review