Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 358

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 140 of the 140 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Arabidopsis Defense against Botrytis cinerea: Chronology and Regulation Deciphered by High-Resolution Temporal Transcriptomic Analysis

Open access
Windram, Oliver, Madhou, Priyadharshini, McHattie, Stuart, Hill, Claire, Hickman, Richard, Cooke, Emma, Jenkins, Dafyd J., Penfold, Christopher A., Baxter, Laura, Breeze, Emily, Kiddle, Steven J., Rhodes, Johanna, Atwell, Susanna, Kliebenstein, Daniel J., Kim, Youn-sung, Stegle, Oliver, Borgwardt, Karsten, Zhang, Cunjin, Tabrett, Alex, Legaie, Roxane, Moore, Jonathan, Finkenstadt, Bärbel, Wild, David L., Mead, Andrew, Rand, David, Beynon, Jim, Ott, Sascha, Buchanan-Wollaston, Vicky, Denby, Katherine J.·2012·The Plant Cell

Abstract

Transcriptional reprogramming forms a major part of a plant's response to pathogen infection. Many individual components and pathways operating during plant defense have been identified, but our knowledge of how these different components interact is still rudimentary. We generated a high-resolution time series of gene expression profiles from a single Arabidopsis thaliana leaf during infection by the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Approximately one-third of the Arabidopsis genome is differentially expressed during the first 48 h after infection, with the majority of changes in gene expression occurring before significant lesion development. We used computational tools to obtain a detailed chronology of the defense response against B. cinerea, highlighting the times at which signaling and metabolic processes change, and identify transcription factor families operating at different times after infection. Motif enrichment and network inference predicted regulatory interactions, and testing of one such prediction identified a role for TGA3 in defense against necrotrophic pathogens. These data provide an unprecedented level of detail about transcriptional changes during a defense response and are suited to systems biology analyses to generate predictive models of the gene regulatory networks mediating the Arabidopsis response to B. cinerea.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1105/tpc.112.102046

Cites

140 of 140 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 140 references

Cited by

See all 358

Metadata

Authors
Windram, O., Madhou, P., McHattie, S., Hill, C., Hickman, R., Cooke, E., Jenkins, D. J., Penfold, C. A., Baxter, L., Breeze, E., Kiddle, S. J., Rhodes, J., Atwell, S., Kliebenstein, D. J., Kim, Y.-S., Stegle, O., Borgwardt, K., Zhang, C., Tabrett, A., Legaie, R., Moore, J., Finkenstadt, B., Wild, D. L., Mead, A., Rand, D., Beynon, J., Ott, S., Buchanan-Wollaston, V., & Denby, K. J.
Venue
The Plant Cell
Published
2012-09-01
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
3530-3557
ISSN
  • 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-298X
OpenAlex
W2112044923
Cited by
358
References
140
FWCI
23.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arabidopsis Defense against Botrytis cinerea: Chronology and Regulation Deciphered by High-Resolution Temporal Transcriptomic Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.112.102046
The paper
Windram, O., Madhou, P., McHattie, S., Hill, C., Hickman, R., Cooke, E., Jenkins, D. J., Penfold, C. A., Baxter, L., Breeze, E., Kiddle, S. J., Rhodes, J., Atwell, S., Kliebenstein, D. J., Kim, Y.-S., Stegle, O., Borgwardt, K., Zhang, C., Tabrett, A., . . . Denby, K. J. (2012). Arabidopsis Defense against Botrytis cinerea: Chronology and Regulation Deciphered by High-Resolution Temporal Transcriptomic Analysis. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.102046

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.